You are not logged in.

  • Login

Dear visitor, you are currently not logged in. Login or Register as a new user .

Radley

Professional

  • "Radley" started this thread

Posts: 623

Location: So Cal

  • Send private message

1

Wednesday, March 14th 2012, 3:40am

The 'Foundational Sonics of the KPA' thread (officially sanctioned by CK)

This thread is a chance for me and *anyone else* including Mr. Kemper, to speak their mind concerning the KPA. The idea here is not to simply complain, but to offer helpful suggestions to improve the product for everyone:

I will start with this observation: I believe the KPA is a very innovative product, with vast potential - for this reason it *will* be copied (the highest form of flattery), and it is important for the originators to stay ahead of the game.

My main issue with the KPA is not it's EQ matching abilities (they are excellent), nor it's current effects arsenal (they are limited, but adequate), nor it's Cab matching capabilities, but rather the basic nature/character of the main 'distortion engine' that is used to build all the different distortion and gain models when profiling. It simply doesn't sound/respond tubey enough - to my ears, it sounds/feels somewhere between a digital simulation and solid state, especially on the transients and attacks. There is a certain 'crackle and sputter' graininess that gives it away for me - I realize that the EQ & Cab matching is enough for many users, but I believe the *nature* of the distortion must become more analog/tubelike for the final result to be totally convincing. At $1800 US, this is certainly not a typical consumer item - it is one of the 'Mercedes in the world of Chevy' modelers - this means it must perform well enough for serious pros, along with everyone else. EQ matching alone is not enough in the recording studio - all the qualities must be there, or they start wheeling out the tube amps.... *DISTORTION Matching* is the weak link of the KPA (and many other modelers as well). IMHO, the KPA engine has not fully captured the essence of quality tube distortion in all it's glory and complexity....

And what say You? :rolleyes:

2

Wednesday, March 14th 2012, 3:51am

The real question you should ask is if you could successfully and consistently pick out the Kemper/real amp in a series of blind a/b tests, and/or perform a live profiling session and have someone switch between the two while you play and see if you can tell which is which.

Radley

Professional

  • "Radley" started this thread

Posts: 623

Location: So Cal

  • Send private message

3

Wednesday, March 14th 2012, 4:29am

I am certainly willing to take such a test, but only in person, for obvious reasons... It would need to be a double-blind test, with no amps or cabs chosen in advance - fair enough.

4

Wednesday, March 14th 2012, 5:01am

Radley, with all my respect...
There is no such thing as a distortion engine or anything like this. There is no such thing as a fundamental amp model or anything.
Out of curiosity, are you playing the KPA through a tube PA and a cab? Because many users doing this reported that the profiled amp sounds exactly the same as the original when played this way. Don't expect the same results that you would IRL with an FRFR or studio monitor solution...

Radley

Professional

  • "Radley" started this thread

Posts: 623

Location: So Cal

  • Send private message

5

Wednesday, March 14th 2012, 5:13am

Radley, with all my respect...
There is no such thing as a distortion engine or anything like this. There is no such thing as a fundamental amp model or anything.
Out of curiosity, are you playing the KPA through a tube PA and a cab? Because many users doing this reported that the profiled amp sounds exactly the same as the original when played this way. Don't expect the same results that you would IRL with an FRFR or studio monitor solution...


Rich - Do you know this for a fact? All the info I have read indicates there is one 'master amp engine' that generates all the distortion profiles, and that is what I am referring to...

Again, this is meant to be *helpful* folks! Why must it become a downer?

6

Wednesday, March 14th 2012, 5:46am

Radley, with all my respect...
There is no such thing as a distortion engine or anything like this. There is no such thing as a fundamental amp model or anything.
Out of curiosity, are you playing the KPA through a tube PA and a cab? Because many users doing this reported that the profiled amp sounds exactly the same as the original when played this way. Don't expect the same results that you would IRL with an FRFR or studio monitor solution...


Rich - Do you know this for a fact? All the info I have read indicates there is one 'master amp engine' that generates all the distortion profiles, and that is what I am referring to...

Again, this is meant to be *helpful* folks! Why must it become a downer?


AxeFX seems to have the same engine that models everything as well; the Kemper has far more variety imo. All I know is that I am glad I never hopped aboard the Axefx train. The Kemper seriously blows it away.

This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Animus" (Mar 14th 2012, 1:59pm)


Radley

Professional

  • "Radley" started this thread

Posts: 623

Location: So Cal

  • Send private message

7

Wednesday, March 14th 2012, 5:54am

I agree that many of the AFX amps sound similar, but are you implying this does not happen with the KPA amps? Not even sure the AFX is important in this discussion since we are wanting to make the KPA the best it can be, regardless of the competition.

Feck

Intermediate

Posts: 198

Location: Chicago, Illinois

  • Send private message

8

Wednesday, March 14th 2012, 7:00am

I agree that many of the AFX amps sound similar, but are you implying this does not happen with the KPA amps? Not even sure the AFX is important in this discussion since we are wanting to make the KPA the best it can be, regardless of the competition.
I will say that in my opinion, this does not happen with the KPA amps. It sounds like what I feed it, period.

tylerhb

Professional

Posts: 1,050

Location: Bremen, Germany

  • Send private message

9

Wednesday, March 14th 2012, 7:57am

RE: The 'Foundational Sonics of the KPA' thread (officially sanctioned by CK)


And what say You? :rolleyes:
I just say that you do not need to start a new thread about your thoughts and impressions about the KPA every two days. All those speculations just lead to nothing but unrest and flaming. And that is not your intention, is it? ;)

10

Wednesday, March 14th 2012, 8:26am

With all due respect:

I certainly get the feeling that all these threads do seem to have the purpose "to stir the pot".

I tend to avoid these threads, since they do not have anything to offer to me.


Cheers,

Dote