You are not logged in.
Dear visitor, you are currently not logged in. Login or Register as a new user .
Anyway, here's a pretty pure demo of the effect using the "Wet Queen" patch that began this thread. It contains Four tests of a sine tone fundamental simulating a bend and release from the 22nd fret to 26th fret on guitar (i.e., 1174Hz to 1479Hz, D to F#) using "Wet Queen" digitally reamped via S/PDIF @ -12dBFS.
Pass 1: All Effects Off
Pass 2: Only Stomp "B" enabled (Metal DS Drive cranked to 10 to exaggerate the effect)
Pass 3: Only Stack section enabled
Pass 4: Stomp "B" + Stack section
KPA Aliasing Test Demo
That is a well done demo, and is revealing in the context of a sine wave test, but it seems like in my demo of actual guitar notes KPA Aliasing Test (by Miles), that the aliasing noise has a little more thickness to it, and is slightly more up front and noticeable than Pass 3 of your sine sweep test. Though the aliasing noise in the amp profiles is generally somewhat subtle, it's important to accurately represent it in a guitar playing context. It's always good to have another perspective, so thanks for that.
Anyway, here's a pretty pure demo of the effect using the "Wet Queen" patch that began this thread. It contains Four tests of a sine tone fundamental simulating a bend and release from the 22nd fret to 26th fret on guitar (i.e., 1174Hz to 1479Hz, D to F#) using "Wet Queen" digitally reamped via S/PDIF @ -12dBFS.
Pass 1: All Effects Off
Pass 2: Only Stomp "B" enabled (Metal DS Drive cranked to 10 to exaggerate the effect)
Pass 3: Only Stack section enabled
Pass 4: Stomp "B" + Stack section
KPA Aliasing Test Demo
The noticeable thing here is that the distortion pedal is a much bigger contributor to the aliasing distortion than the amp model itself is. I've cranked up its gain to exaggerate the effect, but cranking up the Amplifier's gain is not as obvious as the pedal model. And combined, well - it's pretty clear. You can also hear a few clicks as I'm turning the Stomps & Effects sections on and off - they're not completely noiseless (but perhaps they should be; a 5mS crossfade would solve the problem.)
-djh
Wow, nicely done. The aliasing effect in there would be this fluctuating sound you can hear in the background? I can hear that on the 3rd clip quite low but really fast and on the 4 clips much louder and fluctuating slower.
Although I have some sweet amps here at the studio, I've kept various PODs around since the beginning, and closely examined their aliasing, but when that HD came out, I was shocked at how devoid of aliasing it was. Perhaps I wasn't using the "right set of probe tones", but my guitars are very transparent through the POD HD. Sure, they improved the models a little bit, and it still has those unmistakeable POD tones
Now, I don't have an Axe-FX or a POD HD, but I've yet to run across a piece of digitally distorting gear that didn't exhibit this behavior. If you don't hear it, it means you're probably not using the right set of probe tones to bring the behavior out.
, but I'll be damned if they didn't nail a near-total aliasing-free sound. I rarely tracked my PODs and Amp Farm, but I absolutely plan on making records with the KPA, and is why I'm so enthusiastic to see it brought up to its ultimate advanced state.This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "miles" (May 25th 2012, 7:00pm)
It sounds like that to me.Wow, nicely done. The aliasing effect in there would be this fluctuating sound you can hear in the background? I can hear that on the 3rd clip quite low but really fast and on the 4 clips much louder and fluctuating slower.
Could this be the "wind howling noise" that Miles said Kemper was planning to fix in a future release?