You are not logged in.

  • Login

Dear visitor, you are currently not logged in. Login or Register as a new user .

1

Friday, June 8th 2012, 7:04pm

Will Kemper ever release a FRFR Cab?

Hi Guys,

I'm almost ready to buy my Kemper (I actually wait on the Rack version and hopping it will have both Stomps external loop and Effects stereo loops :) ) and I was wondering, since a PowerAmp is apparently already in discussion, if Kemper will ever release a FRFR Cab to go and match perfectly with the Kemper with PowerAmp option?

That way you can just grab your Kemper, the Cab and later the Foot Controller and you're ready to go...

If not, what FRFR Cab and PowerAmp do you recommend?

I never used FRFR cab and I was wondering if a Kemper with a FRFR Amp&Cab and a, let's say a Rectifier profile, will sound as real as a real Rectifier with a cab? From everything I heard so far, it looks like it sounds great for tracking, recording... where you have a limited sound (limited by the mic type, position, room, pre-amp, etc...). But when you really play an Amp, it sounds more full than the sound you will have on a record. Is there any way to get that feeling too with a Kemper? If yes, with what kind of setup?

I know, two questions in one post, but I think they're related :)

Thanks,
Phil

Jimmyno

Professional

Posts: 753

Location: Italy

  • Send private message

2

Friday, June 8th 2012, 7:07pm

The best way to go to get an amp in the room sound is to go with a guitar cab, imho.
Direct profile + power amp (tube or ss, it's up to you)+ guitar cabinet.

I don't know if they'll ever release a frfr cab.

3

Saturday, June 9th 2012, 2:38am

Drummers, Singer, Keyboarders all go thru FRFR monitors on stage.
I have never seen them discussing the best FRFR solution, that they could buy and carry on stage.
Why is that?

CK

viabcroce

Professional

Posts: 1,660

Location: Roma, Italy

Occupation: Personal Trainer for Musicians \ Performance Engineer

  • Send private message

4

Saturday, June 9th 2012, 4:35am

I believe it's because the whole linear approach a digital simulator requires is completely new for a rock guitarist.

We've learned in 60 years of electric guitar that our instruments don't sound good in a mixer or in a keyboard amp (unless is a jazz guitar, or a hollow body and the like). We've learned that the most emotional findings in more than half a century has been taking the amps to work in their non-linear range.

Furthermore, we're fetishists when it comes to instruments, amps, cabs, fx. We spend half of our time playing, and the rest (or more for some) dreaming of owning more stuff, because what we don't own is the cause of us not sounding good (and sometimes of not playing good as well).

The idea that the non linearities of a distorted sound are been taken care in the algorithm is like trying to convince a Ferrari owner that the ultimate technological discovery is a simple living room on four wheels which you command by voice; you just tell it where you want to go, and it will do all by itself, in the fastest and most secure way.

Where has all the magic gone? How can I feel cool any more if all I own is a computer and a PA monitor?
When a rocker states they can't feel the "amp in the room", it's like the Ferrari owner when he can't loose 700 HP by just pressing a pedal; he can't feel his body pushed against the seat by a 600+ Nm torque. No more tyres screeching, no more that fast 6Th-3Th gear change that brings the engine to 8000 rmp @ 180 mph ...

Mr Kemper, you should be aware that people like you and Mr Chase are killing (and burying) a 60-year old mythology. It takes time. Please, be patient with us :)

gianfranco di mare

Musicians Support Association

5

Saturday, June 9th 2012, 5:01am

CK,

allow me to take a stab at your rhetorical question.

First, I congratulate you for asking objective and challenging questions and indirectly stating the obvious....

I think vocalist trust that the front of house sound is accurate and monitors are...well...just....MONITORS. However, many guitarist can't play without the tone and touch sensitivity of THE amp right at their feet....or within immediate sonic range....up close and personal. This most likely comes from sitting in a practice room right in front of the amp. That sound is not available anywhere else, certainly not to the audience... Large venues bands and big name acts don't have an amp at their feet or within that direct immediate range. They have monitors, earbuds (IEMs) or massive slaved backlines that don't sound like THE amp in there favorite setting. They are professionals and have left behind the illusion that there ideal "in the room" sound is something the audience will ever hear. They learn to play listening to the tone the audience hears....the same tone the KPA captures so accurately, the mic'd amp and cab.

So my advice.....simplify your life and go pro, learn to play with the feel of a mic'd amp through FRFR amplification. Its different but hey, its what your audience hears. If that's not good enough, improve the overall tone in the front of house until it meets your standards. That way the audience can enjoy it too!

This isn't meant to draw flames, just to state that modelling, and now profiling, really puts us, the amateur guitarist, in the same setting as the big boys. Just my humble opinion. If amps and cabs are your thing, enjoy!

bd

This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "musicman65" (Jun 9th 2012, 5:08am)


6

Saturday, June 9th 2012, 5:58am

Well, I don't think it's that easy... having the mic'd sound is what the audience hear... on large venue only. On a small gig, there's no need for mic at all and the audience get the full sound.

Then, a keyboard, drums, singer, etc... don't get their sound from the cab. For a guitarist, the cab is almost as important as the amp for the sound. If you'd capture just the amp without the cab, it would just sound like crap.

Nonetheless, the Kemper Profiles are the results of mic'd sounds... which is perfect for studio use, because it's what you hear on the record.

But when I play a real amp in a room, it doesn't sound at all like what you hear on a record, because there's not only 1, 2 or even 3 mics to capture the sound.
So I'm not familiar with the FRFR cab, but I just find hard to understand how the Kemper could capture and re-create all sounds definitions you get from an Amp & Cab when you play in the room, when the profile has been done with only a portion of the sound.

From my understanding, it's like if you sample 4 seconds of a song and you say you could re-play the entire 4 minutes of the song... Well, I guess that would be true for these 4 seconds, but you'd miss some parts.

And it's not because it's the one of the solution most pro for large venues decided to adopt that it's the best one... I'm not playing for 25,000 people, never did and will probably never do. The only real solution I see is to profile the Amp only with a loadbox (such the Torpedo or so). I've been thinking about it. That way I would understand... full signal from the amp. And then we could use a real cab on stage... That would make more sense in my head :)

I might be completely wrong, but that's how I understand it and that's why I'm asking the question :)

Phil

7

Saturday, June 9th 2012, 8:01am

I think one of the reasons that guitarists have this hangover about a 'physical' amp, is because only an "electric guitar+amp" is historically considered a complete instrument and the immediate interaction between the player and the "instrument" is something that most musicians cherish.

And I dont think guitarists are the only ones. Most drummers prefer real drums to electric pads for live playing, pianists still prefer a grand piano to a keyboard (for piano sounds), sax players/violin players/etc all seem to still be using miced instruments rather than their electric/digital versions even though great digital products are available today.

However, this might change, but it will take time to change tradition.

I think Kemper is absolutely amazing, stunning, groundbreaking, but I am one of those who would love to use the Kemper + cab as the perfect replacement for a tube amp (even though it is a great recording/direct to PA solution), simply because (in my outdated head), I still see the electric guitar as a "complete instrument" only when coupled with a amplified cabinet.

8

Saturday, June 9th 2012, 12:55pm


I think Kemper is absolutely amazing, stunning, groundbreaking, but I am one of those who would love to use the Kemper + cab as the perfect replacement for a tube amp (even though it is a great recording/direct to PA solution), simply because (in my outdated head), I still see the electric guitar as a "complete instrument" only when coupled with a amplified cabinet.


Have you tried it yet?

Stemast

Professional

Posts: 686

Location: UK

  • Send private message

9

Saturday, June 9th 2012, 1:05pm


I think Kemper is absolutely amazing, stunning, groundbreaking, but I am one of those who would love to use the Kemper + cab as the perfect replacement for a tube amp (even though it is a great recording/direct to PA solution), simply because (in my outdated head), I still see the electric guitar as a "complete instrument" only when coupled with a amplified cabinet.


Have you tried it yet?


:thumbup:

10

Saturday, June 9th 2012, 2:35pm

I don't want to be disrespectful, but you react just like the Kemper would be different from having a real amp with a mic'd cab on stage (such the AxeTrak or equivalent). I personally don't know how it could be possible.

So in that case, in few time for very small venue, we already tried to have Monitoring (RCF) only for the guitarist with the amp running to a closed mic'd cab and it was good for the audience, but not at all for the guitarist. The feeling wasn't there and it was missing something...

That's the reason why I'm asking for the cab situation for "live usage"