You are not logged in.
Dear visitor, you are currently not logged in. Login or Register as a new user .
This post has been edited 3 times, last edit by "sheguitarplayer" (Jan 26th 2012, 5:58pm)
I own an AxefxII and feel that there are a few percentage points still missing, though it sounds excellent.
Also, have you done any critical listening tests of tube amp tracks compared to KPA profiled tracks?
What did you discover?
I really don't care if the profile sound exactly the same as the original amp. I'm much more concerned if it's able to capture and replicate every aspect of the sound and feel of a tube amp to a degree that I can't tell a difference.
I'm going to post this at TGP too since this place is a bit of a ghost town.
thanks,
Steve
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Guitartone" (Jan 26th 2012, 7:06pm)
As long as you're not looking for 120%, I think you'll find those few missing percentage points with the Kemper.![]()
My honest opinion: this is the most impressive piece of gear I had in my life (30+ years playing, not a pro...but still), including tube amps and analog gear in this statement.
I have yet to see anybody (with one exception) trying the KPA and not being seriously impressed, and I'm talking about hardcore tube guys, not a digital head like me![]()
The only way to know for sure is to get one myself and that's what I plan to do. As convincing as your feedback is, I still remember people saying similar things about the first Axefx. I hope when I get one, if they ever show up in the US, I have the same experience as you with it.
thanks much,
Steve