You are not logged in.
Dear visitor, you are currently not logged in. Login or Register as a new user .
I like several ideas here. And I will be very happy to have a dedicated Foot Controller from Kemper!!
The switch that is really missing from the CK prototype (also as a feature in the KPA itself) is the LOOPER.
What do you think about it?
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "blewis" (May 1st 2012, 1:43pm)
You don't want to come up with a looper function a year from now, but have sold 500 foot controllers with layouts that won't work for looper controller.

This layout looks perfect to me. The exp pedal jacks 1&2 are on the correct side/ the fx on off is perfect at the bottom/ the tap is in a very convenient place/ the tuner is tucked away so no hitting it by mistake in the middle of a song.Very nice, can't wait!
I would prefer effect switches on bottom row. I use them much more often than preset switching.
i'm afraid it's gonna be tough to make that a majority's point of view, but count me in!
![]()
Looks good to me, I'd also use the FX buttons more than the actual rig changes.This layout looks perfect to me. The exp pedal jacks 1&2 are on the correct side/ the fx on off is perfect at the bottom/ the tap is in a very convenient place/ the tuner is tucked away so no hitting it by mistake in the middle of a song.Very nice, can't wait!
I would prefer effect switches on bottom row. I use them much more often than preset switching.
i'm afraid it's gonna be tough to make that a majority's point of view, but count me in!
![]()
A couple of questions for Christoph:
Regarding MIDI functions (to be implemented on the KPA)
1) Are buttons 1-5 limited to sending Program Change equivalents?
2) Are buttons I, II, III, IV limited to sending 1-2 MIDI CCs equivalents?
3) Are all of these programmable?
4) Will you implement the possibility of any buttons sending MIDI Note and sequencer start/stop? I would like to be able to trigger some Virus stuff ya know.
5) FInally, in your calculations, how much cost to the end user is saved by not having a simple MIDI out on the foot controller?
I like that you've realized the MIDI function already exists in the KPA, but it makes the foot controller so much less general purpose. I know you've said proprietary, but not having any general purpose use built in will affect how I perceive the price when it comes time to buy.
Proprietary means, that the board will not have its own power supply.
This will save significant costs.
Also we don't want to have this pedal selfcontained, with all kinds of midi functions. At least not initially.
If we add generic midi functions, they can be sent thru the Profilers Midi Out.
We can avoid a complicated programing method on the device itself.
that's good news for me.
dear mr. kemper, you replied to a lot of comments, but never to the more compact approaches...
(i really like the last one with the stomp-switches at the bottom row...)
are you considering a more compact design at all??