You are not logged in.
Dear visitor, you are currently not logged in. Login or Register as a new user .
the Kemper profiling technology is truly groundbreaking, but it is implemented alongside a rather dated box of code.
What on earth are you talking about?
the Kemper profiling technology is truly groundbreaking, but it is implemented alongside a rather dated box of code.
What on earth are you talking about?
Forget about Profiling, how does the KPA produce it's pristine clean tones and organic distortion if it's "box of code" is old & dated?I agree that the aliasing issue is ongoing and tends to reflect negatively on the current KPA package - the Kemper profiling technology is truly groundbreaking, but it is implemented alongside a rather dated box of code. The KPA profiling deserves better than it's current packaging, IMHO...
That's not a fair comparison. I understand what Radley is saying. If you are trying to replicate something your main goal is to be as accurate as possible but most important of all is to do not introduce undesired results in the process, like the ones described by Radley.You could say the same about the stratocaster. It's noisy, the trem doesn't stay in tune when you bend more than a little, the sound can be too harsh, to work on the circuit you need to take off everything and some more dowsides. You hear digital artifacts but do not complain about pickup noises, right? Users got around the strats problems somehow or they live with it. The question is always if these points are that important that you can not work with it at all. Now is it a dealbreaker or just one more backroundnoise?