You are not logged in.
Dear visitor, you are currently not logged in. Login or Register as a new user .
Although I would take out some of the pricklies from your statements, I do generally agree that updating the "containment vessel" would be greatly appreciated and (in some places that you point out) very much needed.
Please explain specifically about the 'pricklies' you refer to - don't be vague, but spell them out clearly and I will respond with a likewise serious answer...
'I am talking about a 'support system' with very weak Noise reduction, Stomp ODs with unacceptable amounts of aliasing and noise, an unreliable OS, and totally unrealistic startup times for performing.'
Is the above quote what you object to? I honestly don't see anything inaccurate or 'prickly', but a rather honest assessment of the current 'package', with the current OS. There are also advertised features that remain nonexistent.
This isn't constructive criticism or constructive advice, this is an insult to Kemper.Again, I often feel that Kemper would do everyone a favor by selling/leasing their profiling system to a larger company with more support & financial clout who could expedite the process & bring amp profiling to the undeniable forefront of modern guitar sound...
This is an insult to Kemper.Again, I often feel that Kemper would do everyone a favor by selling/leasing their profiling system to a larger company with more support & financial clout who could expedite the process & bring amp profiling to the undeniable forefront of modern guitar sound...
It took Fractal six years to come up with Axe-FX11, OS6.This is an insult to Kemper.Again, I often feel that Kemper would do everyone a favor by selling/leasing their profiling system to a larger company with more support & financial clout who could expedite the process & bring amp profiling to the undeniable forefront of modern guitar sound...
Why Lance? CK Kemper has made a great contribution to guitar sonics regardless if he is in sole control of the manufacturing process, no? His is the master creative aspect of envisioning the profiling process and bringing it into being no? How can his creativity/creation be demeaned? My comments are fueled by the rather slow process of updates, bug fixes, fulfilled features, etc... please don't tell me I'm the only one who has become concerned about this stuff.
This is an insult to Kemper.Again, I often feel that Kemper would do everyone a favor by selling/leasing their profiling system to a larger company with more support & financial clout who could expedite the process & bring amp profiling to the undeniable forefront of modern guitar sound...
What's there to be 'concerned' about?
Apparently, AxeFX losing prominence.
Although I would take out some of the pricklies from your statements, I do generally agree that updating the "containment vessel" would be greatly appreciated and (in some places that you point out) very much needed.
and totally unrealistic startup times for performing.'
.
Exactly how many times do you start up when performing a show?It's good to let even real tube amps warm up for at least 10 to 20 minutes you know. I can't see how 2 or 3 minutes for the Kemper to boot is killing show times. Plus Neil could use the extra pre-show setup time to get his hairpiece and pants snake perfect.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "Animus" (May 20th 2012, 8:54am)
I believe they are quite fast fixing issues compared to most companies. In 4 months they have released 8 firmware versions with different improvements, additions and fixes (brought to their attention by users or not). Should Line 6 have sold their modelling technology to a bigger company when they released their first POD because it was not perfect and had its issues? I think they have done pretty well since then, don't you think? And I don't recall Line 6 (even today) releasing fixes and updates as often as Kemper.This is an insult to Kemper.Again, I often feel that Kemper would do everyone a favor by selling/leasing their profiling system to a larger company with more support & financial clout who could expedite the process & bring amp profiling to the undeniable forefront of modern guitar sound...
Why Lance? CK Kemper has made a great contribution to guitar sonics regardless if he is in sole control of the manufacturing process, no? His is the master creative aspect of envisioning the profiling process and bringing it into being no? How can his creativity/creation be demeaned? My comments are fueled by the rather slow process of updates, bug fixes, fulfilled features, etc... please don't tell me I'm the only one who has become concerned about this stuff.
This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "MadH" (May 20th 2012, 8:43pm)