Yeah, it would be nice to see something similar to this:
[Blocked Image: http://img542.imageshack.us/img542/9294/hellcatkempermatcheq.png]
Add myself to this request. Pics make life far easier.
+2
I also wunder this! +666 from hear 
just today I was thinking about that!!
I would have this feature all my life!! 
+1
Great suggestion! +1
A graphical representation of something even better! 
[Blocked Image: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d2/Anatomy_of_the_Human_Ear.svg/800px-Anatomy_of_the_Human_Ear.svg.png]
A graphical representation of something even better!
[Blocked Image: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d2/Anatomy_of_the_Human_Ear.svg/800px-Anatomy_of_the_Human_Ear.svg.png]
Ahahahaha are you suggesting we use our ears??? Come on were guitar players!!! 
A graphical representation of something even better!
I'd have it sound good rather than look good. But as we may say: "you listen with your eyes first" 
Most of the time, two senses are better than one.
It helps me a lot to both see and hear what I am doing to the sound. That way I can see and listen at the same time, it helps me to know what to listen for. Just turning a dial it is often difficult to tell how you are shaping the sound from just listening. Graphical interfaces are always a good enhancement. I can't see why anyone would complain about adding this visual in a future feature update.
I agree that a visualization of the equalising settings is not essential (it does not add information but merely shows it in a different way), and that listening comes first, of course. But it would be handy in many circumstances.
For instance, there may be different equalisation points within one rig (the tone stack of the amp itself, the tone knobs of different stomps and effects, several different EQ stomps in series...). If you hear a certain undesired peak in the low, mid or high spectrum, a quick glance at an EQ stomp should tell you whether it is the culprit or not. And a graph is just easier to see and interpret than a numerical value, especially if it is buried behind a couple of pages of settings...
Besides, if using our ears was to be enough, we wouldn't need those numbers or green LEDs either, right?
For instance, there may be different equalisation points within one rig (the tone stack of the amp itself, the tone knobs of different stomps and effects, several different EQ stomps in series...). If you hear a certain undesired peak in the low, mid or high spectrum, a quick glance at an EQ stomp should tell you whether it is the culprit or not. And a graph is just easier to see and interpret than a numerical value, especially if it is buried behind a couple of pages of settings...
now I don't know if you're asking for a visual representation of the curve you set in the EQ or if you're asking for a frequency analyser. 
A graphical representation of something even better!
[Blocked Image: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d2/Anatomy_of_the_Human_Ear.svg/800px-Anatomy_of_the_Human_Ear.svg.png]
now I don't know if you're asking for a visual representation of the curve you set in the EQ or if you're asking for a frequency analyser.
The first one. I was just saying that even if you have good ears, a visual representation of how a specific EQ stomp is configured can make easier to understand its role in the overall sound.
Maybe something like the way a stomp box graphic equaliser has a row of say 6 sliders with preset freqs?
I am missing a graphic representation of the filter curve too. It would give an impression of the EQ settings at a glance. Currently we have to scroll through four pages of studio equalizer settings to get an overview. The display of the graphic EQ is much better in this respect.
I've had devices that display the curve. To be honest, I never found that to be useful.
