For me yes, it's the same and i listened the samples with good monitors and the volume turned up a lot.
Not for me, the sound of the real amp has still more bass probably due to the room.
For me yes, it's the same and i listened the samples with good monitors and the volume turned up a lot.
Not for me, the sound of the real amp has still more bass probably due to the room.
For me yes, it's the same and i listened the samples with good monitors and the volume turned up a lot.
Same here. I listened to it with my 4 sets of headphones and 2 sets of studio monitors and it´s pretty incredible. I can barely hear a difference. I´m really wondering if Lasse and Sam and the others I heard it from might have encountered a bug or something with the uncorrect mids. Would be interesting to know whats up there!
Here is a small test with my JMP thru a chinese ribbon microphone :
http://www.dropbox.com/s/1q6cj…ud2/comparaison.flac?dl=0
The room's reverb always makes sound more clearer so there is a difference but IMO the profile is still too much muddy with 2.6.
Profile is first.
to me it just sounds tighter with slightly more definition
Quick question.
Do profiles made with firmware < 2.6 will sound as good as this made with firmware >= 2.6?
Quick question.
Do profiles made with firmware < 2.6 will sound as good as this made with firmware >= 2.6?
They seems to be modified by the way the lfc doesn't work here, on or off with old rigs changes nothing.
Cleans sound better IMO with 2.6.
I've been back and forth between 2.5 and 2.6 this morning and 2.6 is ok for me.
(lfc button still doesn't work at all with old rigs, it seems always on)
I've been back and forth between 2.5 and 2.6 this morning and 2.6 is ok for me.
(lfc button still doesn't work at all with old rigs, it seems always on)
That's not the behaviour I experienced. When I use LFC, there is always a difference between off and on, even with the free profiles and factory profiles.
That's not the behaviour I experienced. When I use LFC, there is always a difference between off and on, even with the free profiles and factory profiles.
Agreed. A bigger difference can be heard when turning it on/off with some rigs than others, and the speakers used to listen will also affect the differences.
EDIT/UPDATE:
I found the issue I was having. Seems that not my micpres wheren't faulty, but for some reason the Kemper brightened up all audio passing through for the reamps at the profling session.
I have still no idea what went wrong, especially since I didn't change anything to booting it up again at home. No EQ was engaged (also not the output EQ), but it sounds like some sort of hi-shelf was on.
So heres the updated test, now with the real MIC track instead of the reference amp.
Kemper 2.6 Firmwaretest UPDATE
Due to me monitoring through the Kemper at that session the tone is REALLY dull and lo end heavy (compensated the brighter tone in the kemper with duller amp settings and mic placement it seems).
Well, at least that way you can hear even more what the update does to the lo end ^ ^
Sorry for the inconvenience.
I'm especially puzzled as of why the same profiles sounded like the mic track after I came home, without me changing anything about the settings on the kemper.
The updated folder now contains:
-the actual mic
-profile created with 2.42
-profile created with 2.6
-profile created with 2.42 played in 2.6 with LFC ON
sorry for asking but what is LFC?
sorry for asking but what is LFC?
Low frequency compensation, a feature that can be found in FW 2.6 (read the docs).
Agreed. A bigger difference can be heard when turning it on/off with some rigs than others, and the speakers used to listen will also affect the differences.
I will make a record.
You can really hear the difference! It´s not MUCH but it´s there.
here are the profiles in case anyone wants to try himself.
2.6
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.…014-09-15%2021-20-12.kipr
2.42
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.…014-09-15%2021-19-55.kipr
EDIT/UPDATE:
I found the issue I was having. Seems that not my micpres wheren't faulty, but for some reason the Kemper brightened up all audio passing through for the reamps at the profling session.
I have still no idea what went wrong, especially since I didn't change anything to booting it up again at home. No EQ was engaged (also not the output EQ), but it sounds like some sort of hi-shelf was on.
Hey Mago, I had something really similar to this yesterday. When changing rigs for the first few notes, it would sound fine. Then after a few seconds, it would start sounding weird... kinda phasey and the high-end was kinda boosted. I reset the global prefs and it went away. I don't know what it was, but it was very strange!
i made this experience sometimes that the frequency sounds dull, than i usually make a System reset, and everything works fine
i made this experience sometimes that the frequency sounds dull, than i usually make a System reset, and everything works fine
Do you have a backup from before and after? I heavily doubt that a "System Reset" solves such problems. That reset merely sets certain parameters to default (like display contrast and stuff) and I have no idea which parameter should influence "the frequency".
If you do have a backup from before, please send them both to support. I am very interested.
Hey Drew, I don't know if I had the same issue or not.
here's a short wav to display the difference. First how the profile sounded back at home, then how it sounded at the profiling session.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/3961577/WeirdHiBoost.wav
Sounds to me like maybe an EQ was active without being displayed. I always turn off stomps and stuff before switching to profile mode, and I never ever changed anything about the master eq on the kemper. And even if I had some kind of stomp active and it may be wasn't displayed as active, why would the reference amp during profiling also be affected? Weird weird.