I wonder what had to be changed ?
FW 3.0 - Where are the announced Michael Wagener Profiles?
- EVH5150
- Thread is marked as Resolved.
-
-
Question is: What is the difference from April pack?
Do these sound better?
Any information would be appreciated. -
Question is: What is the difference from April pack?
Do these sound better?
Any information would be appreciated.Yep if you have the old and new pack fill us in on whats different please
-
Yep if you have the old and new pack fill us in on whats different please
The thing is, I am not interested in making the investigation...
I only would like to know what the difference is.
For anyone who might be interested - April pack is available here: http://www.kemper-amps.com/for…?postID=224109#post224109 -
Regarding the rigs, it seems to be the same list to me, adjustments are not so clear ? I was already happy with the 67 & 69 previous metros.
-
The thing is, I am not interested in making the investigation...
I only would like to know what the difference is.
For anyone who might be interested - April pack is available here: http://www.kemper-amps.com/for…?postID=224109#post224109Sorry Peto i didnt mean you to do it i was just generalising if users have the old pack and the new one could they let us know what the differences are if they hear any
-
Sorry Peto i didnt mean you to do it i was just generalising if users have the old pack and the new one could they let us know what the differences are if they hear any
It's OK No problem here.
Still I think, that the easiest way would be, if Kemper spoke a little bit about the difference. -
I have now downloaded both, but won't have a KPA near until wednesday (when hopefully my new unpowered toaster should arrive - twice the Kemper love, what with my Power Rack too! )
-
I did not try previous ones, but let me tell you: those profiles just sound phenomenal!
Check them out
-
hi guys
and thank you for your patience!FYI:
The re-release of the MW Rig Pack became necessary since some of the rigs that should have been merged profiles were 'only' studio profiles the first time around. -
FYI:
The re-release of the MW Rig Pack became necessary since some of the rigs that should have been merged profiles were 'only' studio profiles the first time around.
Don, thanks for the info.
So we have more valuable cabs! -
hi guys
and thank you for your patience!FYI:
The re-release of the MW Rig Pack became necessary since some of the rigs that should have been merged profiles were 'only' studio profiles the first time around.Thanks Don for filling us in
-
Err, I'm a bit reluctant to test the new ones for fear of over-writing what I've already tweaked of which 3 I've saved to my favs. Hi Don, could you be even more specific re the actual rigs that have changed? Thanks.
-
Err, I'm a bit reluctant to test the new ones for fear of over-writing what I've already tweaked of which 3 I've saved to my favs. Hi Don, could you be even more specific re the actual rigs that have changed? Thanks.
Hi Karl.
The re-released rigs have a different creation date than the first batch, so even though they share the same filename, they can co-exist happily on your profiler.you can try this behaviour:
Choose any rig, press store, than 'Store as', keep the same name and you will have two identically named rigs with different creation dates. (Technically I think the creation date down to the second becomes part of the rig name, as you can see when looking at .kipr files on your computer, but that's not the point)hth
-
Hi Karl.
The re-released rigs have a different creation date than the first batch, so even though they share the same filename, they can co-exist happily on your profiler.you can try this behaviour:
Choose any rig, press store, than 'Store as', keep the same name and you will have two identically named rigs with different creation dates. (Technically I think the creation date down to the second becomes part of the rig name, as you can see when looking at .kipr files on your computer, but that's not the point)hth
...........thanks for the info Don...