Pure Cabinet setting programmable on each preset and not only to the global output
Pure Cabinet with the possibility to modify the sweetness of the higher frequency and the presence with more efficiency and accuracy
Pure Cabinet on each preset
-
-
+1000
Like it is now it is not very usable for me -
Yup.
-
that would be really, really nice. that, and an extra delay.
-
A reasonable request yielding a favourable outcome for alI I believe.
-
This has already been asked and Mr. CK himself anticipated that this option will be in a future FW
-
Pure Cabinet setting programmable on each preset and not only to the global output
Pure Cabinet with the possibility to modify the sweetness of the higher frequency and the presence with more efficiency and accuracyPure cab on each RIG (not preset ) means it will be removed from output section, because they would overlap - right? Because ckemper said "We have plans to add an additional per-rig PureCabinet in the Cabinet section, in a future OS."
-
If that's what CK said, then that makes sense, Skoczy.
-
If that's what CK said, then that makes sense, Skoczy.
What makes sense? (good we can use verbs here) What I asked about overlapping or what CK stated? Adding pure cabinet per rig option without removing the global option?
If there will be added option to use pure cabinet per rig, you have to design how it will be behaving when there is also global option.
I know everybody loves points
1) Will the local option override the global one?
2) If you will have local option disabled (but enabled earlier and set to 2.0 for example) for particular rig, and global option enabled to 7.0 and you copy this particular rig to performance, should the global option value be copied along with it? How it is done now?And "thousand" more questions...
-
My guess it would be like other effects that can also be global such as "space" or the global EQ, unless pure cab is completely removed from Global so less questions would have to be answered and no meetings would be required to discuss the issues
-
Pure cab on each RIG (not preset ) means it will be removed from output section, because they would overlap - right? Because ckemper said "We have plans to add an additional per-rig PureCabinet in the Cabinet section, in a future OS."What makes sense?
If that's what CK said, then your question makes sense Skoczy.As for all your questions, I too have them and more; it's all about how the local and global settings would interact / override / add to each other and so on. We'll just have to wait and see what the team comes up with, mate.
Put your seatbelt on, hang on for the ride, and keep your hat on, bro'.
-
If that's what CK said, then your question makes sense Skoczy.As for all your questions, I too have them and more; it's all about how the local and global settings would interact / override / add to each other and so on. We'll just have to wait and see what the team comes up with, mate.
Put your seatbelt on, hang on for the ride, and keep your hat on, bro'.
These questions are at the same time the suggestions/requests. The sooner they pop up, more chance that folks at Kemper HQ will read them and implement.
If this forum is "Feature requests" then formulate the requests in most precise way to make it most readable and usable for devs - that way you won't have to smile to a feature that you haven't requested And the other way is still "I want this, I want that, Why this is done this way not that iTunish "
-
Agreed, Skoczy.