I know, there are a lot of threads with this topic but so much different statements.
Does any one has really good experiences in results with profiling as Studio, Direct and Merged ones?
What is the best method for quality and handling?
Direkt vs. Studio vs. Merged Profile what is the better quality?
- hal2000
- Thread is marked as Resolved.
-
-
I personally prefer studio since you get the tone from everything in that specific chain but its all subjective IMO.
-
Yes, you are right. It is so subjective. Perhaps someone made frequence graph or any other technical tests
except the ear. -
I asked questions of a similar nature here Riddle me this. What are the advantages of Merged Profiles
I think it comes down to how your going to use the Profiles. Each seem better suited for different purposes.
-
Thank you. That is exactly what i was looking for!
-
-
I think merged would be the best one in any case. As it is a studio profile plus a direct profile in one
-
I realy dont care! I like the profiles who are sounding like a real amp and acting like a dynamic tubeamp trough my speakers and PA!
i play 95% live so to me good sounding and feeling is the most importent! not how the parmeters and curves are sectioned inside the Kemper, or how the amp was profiled!