[RZ] Freedman JJ100 - special offer now live-huge discount.

Hmm, my mistake. Did think it sounded muddier anyways like you'd just messed with some EQ ..badly.

#update - what are you, 15?

Be good if you could come up with your own ideas rather than trying to troll others though ... just a thought

And to answer your questions; that's definitely not me playing those mistakes and our spelling certainly surpasses yours? Your content is always riddled with mistakes.

@GAME-OF-TONES is this really how you want to come across to potential customers?

Quote from Michael_dk

@GAME-OF-TONES is this really how you want to come across to potential customers?

Completely agree here. I'm disappointed!

"I'd recognise my playing anywhere" Then posts that?
Man am i really reading this or is it the beer??

Ash

I dub thee, Game of Tonks.

Joffrey Jr has a nice ring to it ...

Not beyond apologising when it's necessary... But will provide some context:

I felt the need to call this out as such a short, looped clip posted with a basically identical title to our own clip caused alarm bells to ring.

Of course we don't want to come across to potential customers the wrong way and apparently that has happened but had felt the clip was intended to antagonise and just wanted to ensure that our work hadn't been used without permission (which I think is fair enough to do so - and many of you would feel the same way if you were worried regarding similar issues...) by addressing it publicly here.

Apologies to you and of course we would rather focus on our own stuff.

Riff on.

Quote from GAME-OF-TONES

Not beyond apologising when it's necessary... But will provide some context:

I felt the need to call this out as such a short, looped clip posted with a basically identical title to our own clip caused alarm bells to ring.

Of course we don't want to come across to potential customers the wrong way and apparently that has happened but had felt the clip was intended to antagonise and just wanted to ensure that our work hadn't been used without permission (which I think is fair enough to do so - and many of you would feel the same way if you were worried regarding similar issues...) by addressing it publicly here.

Apologies to you and of course we would rather focus on our own stuff.

Riff on.

Display More

"basically identical to the title of our own clip" - yeah, in the way that it's basically identical to the name of the ORIGINAL SONG BY KILLWITCH ENGAGE? Wow, what a coincidence.

It's one thing to "ensure that your work hadn't been used without permission" - but you know, maybe take a second to LISTEN to the two clips beside one another before slandering? Or just listen to HIS clip and realise it's not looped?

But then your closing remark after realising you were in error, that really puts the cherry on top.

Wasn't a customer before; definitely won't be in the future.

Quote from Michael_dk

"basically identical to the title of our own clip" - yeah, in the way that it's basically identical to the name of the ORIGINAL SONG BY KILLWITCH ENGAGE? Wow, what a coincidence.
It's one thing to "ensure that your work hadn't been used without permission" - but you know, maybe take a second to LISTEN to the two clips beside one another before slandering? Or just listen to HIS clip and realise it's not looped?

But then your closing remark after realising you were in error, that really puts the cherry on top.

Wasn't a customer before; definitely won't be in the future.

The title has since been edited and the clip (0:25s) is just the opening 5sec riff looped ? And of course, we absolutely compared the clips before posting; numerous times... If there was more to differentiate upon we likely wouldn't have brought it up ?

Edit: the realisation of error (and apology given...) was after more was included (in a secondary clip).

Sorry to hear that, it is of course your decision to make though, hopefully you may change your opinion at some point.

Edit 2: I feel we have the right to defend our selves/opinions/stance/comments on this... But have been asked to not post here which is entirely fair and shall respect that (as we would wish for the same if requested...) if you would like to continue discussion in any way you can either message us or begin a thread.

It's poor form and just too bad. All of this simply could have been handled via the private conversation feature on the forum. Everyone's good name stays intact that way.

Back on topic...great profiles!!! Working on a clip!

Quote from gibson5413

It's poor form and just too bad. All of this simply could have been handled via the private conversation feature on the forum. Everyone's good name stays intact that way.

Well said. I don't care for the squabbling on forum and maybe it can be deleted by the posters to close the issue?

You certainly can't argue about Dan's quality of profiles though. I love the Mesa Rev F! Any sign of the merged profiles soon?

Keep up the amazing work and ignore the detractors.

Oh man!!! Profile number "S08" in this pack was GORGEOUS! Almost no "windtunnel" effect either. Perfect

Here's a demo!
First it has a bit of 80s sounding Valhalla reverb and chorus and then it's 100% dry!

Also, can anybody tell if right or left is the live recording? I double tracked the solo

This set sounds great so far - plenty of variation with the boost/cab/mic options. Cederick's pick sounds awesome for me on LP as well. I particulary like the TUL G12 profiles and the TS808 has a great tone with this amp. Keep em coming.