Kemper high end and fizz

The general difference I hear between real amp/Kemper profile is that the Kemper has less bottom and super highs.

On this comparison I didn't hear much difference tho

Quote from space_song

I wanted to do an update on this since I wasn't entirely convinced it wasn't a hardware issue with my unit.

I tracked another part and recorded the DI signals though my J48 DI box into my Profire 2626 and through my Kemper front end going spdif into the interface, then level matched and reamped though my spdif loop. I'm noticing some differences that I pointed out in my original post. The J48 reamp had less congestion overall a bit more punch and dynamics on the low end and a less static high end fizz.

The track is j48 di first then the Kemper DI. I took two sections and did a low pass/ high pass to highlight the differences I'm hearing.

External Content soundcloud.com

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Anyone else experience this?

Display More

Your assessment strikes me as bias confirmation, namely because both clips null as much as two re-amped samples can, which tells me the differences are so minuscule as to be practically imperceptible.

I agree

and I.