Ok, so in the past I thought it would be great to just be able to take a few profiles, set them at certain control positions and then have the Kemper morph between them as a way to emulate the real amps controls....
...I now have a better idea. And I think this one might be more feasible for Christoph and his team to implement - Extended Profiling.
Here’s the idea, let’s start with the bass tone pot, there could be a phase of profiling where you are promoted to or select “profile bass tone control”, the Kemper can send out just a simpler either white noise or other impulse and you would be required to set the bass tone pot to its minimum, press a button to start, dial the pot up to max then press a button to stop the profiling. The profiler could then determine the frequency mid, the q, the min and max throw and possibly even give a guesstimate of the taper (though perhaps that would require more user input, perhaps letting the unit know the middle 12 o clock position would be enough) given that nothing else was changing.
Repeat for all the tone controls in the amp, maybe even do the same for the gain pot to just grab the frequency shifts as gain goes up and down. And perhapss even have the option to mark or hide the controls that don’t actually exist in the amp, e.g. not all have presence controls.
Voila - yes a little more (optional) work, but a much closer profile and set of working controls. I know that I’d be willing to go through this process to build my profiles as accurately as possible, it’s not much more than doing a merged profile really. And I think the info wouldn’t bloat up the profile file much or be very costly performance wise as it’s just setting ranges and curves of controls rather than trying to fully morph between different profiles.