Display MoreThis reminds of the the current mainstream in many European (American?) public diskussions: A sometimes "off-topic" form of political correctness becomes mandatory and more important than dealing with facts and arguments based on differing assumptions.
Funny that esp. in Germany, which has famous philosophers like Hegel who proposed the thesis/anti-thesis as a necessary method for "dialectic" progress - off mainstream point of views get heavily beaten by the "political correctness watch".
From what I remember Hadley has been a pro-guitarist for many moons. He owns a Kemper - meaning he is interested in the product and is trying to use it in a productive way in his environment.
Before you beat him down step into his shoes and try to see what he is seeing. Then reply with a strong argument if that is not your point of view (like cK did). Arguments can be very sharp or pointed and sometimes even sarcastic, but judging people as trolls because they do not applaude your point of view has become way too easy and common.
BTW - Total satisfaction means "end of all progress".
I dig reading through threads with controversial discussions - as long as the BS is kept away. More often than not both parties have a point.
Hadley I encourage you to continue to share your opinions - maybe offer samples or further explanations of what you do not like. Just because you did - cK replied with a very pointed post, that for itself contains useful background information we might not have otherwise.
By exchanging controversial arguments we can all gain more "in-depth" understanding of this product.
Be good sports guys!
H
+1
But: I find it unnecessary to open up several threads for this spreading all over the forum.
Let's keep it focused and on- topic.
@ Hadley: When CK offered to discuss several aspects of the profiling in detail it would have been better and more on topic orientated (IMO) to NOT repeat the same theses as in the "Distortion model" thread and this thread here.
I will follow the other thread now and have no problem with controversity per se.