hi, i am having a hard time understanding you.
Every time a new machine comes out you whine to get a kemper 2. But let's be logical 2 minutes and imagine kemper2 comes.
This would mean a devaluation of kemper 1 (loss of money) and a migration to kpa2 (therefore still loss of money) to obtain a product whose upgrades would not justify such an investment compared to what kemper 1 brings .
By your comments, you push the firm to release a kemper 2 and therefore to abandon the possible improvements of kemper 1.