FILTERING DIRECT PROFILES FROM NORMAL

I don’t use Direct Profiles and find them real annoying when browsing for rigs. I also don’t use folders because RM can search in sub folders so they just make life difficult. However, the combination of these two factors is the one thing I do use folders for,

As Nicky said, sort on the Cabinet Column or search for Rigs with N/A n the cabinet field. I then select and move all of those into a new folder call Direct Amps. Anytime I get a new rig pack I now import all the direct profiles separately into this folder so that I do have them in case I ever want them in future but they don’t get in the way under normal circumstances.

Although this workflow is a way of avoiding Direct Amps for me the same logic would work perfectly for you as a means of being able to quickly access them.

Quote from Wheresthedug

I don’t use Direct Profiles and find them real annoying when browsing for rigs. I also don’t use folders because RM can search in sub folders so they just make life difficult. However, the combination of these two factors is the one thing I do use folders for,

You can search all subfolders if you choose "ALL RIGS" in the left menu. Took me several weeks to discover this

Quote from spotter

You can search all subfolders if you choose "ALL RIGS" in the left menu. Took me several weeks to discover this

I know but that doesn't help when you want to search sub folder of just one main folder. Instead of getting the results for the main folder and it's sub folders you get potentially hundreds of results from unrelated folders. In the end I decided folders are just more hassle than they are worth. If Kemper improve the search functionality I might reconsider but as things stand I'm pretty satisfied without them.

I did the classification of the profiles with N/A and put them in a folder, however, I found another profiles as DI, and I want to know if is a "secret" way to clasify all of them.

jprmusicman It would seem logical for the Kemper to tag direct profiles during the profiling stage as this is one of the questions asked during profiling so the information is there but isn’t captured unfortunately.

this could be a nice improvement!