Profiling differences: Distorted VS Clean (Profiling Assintant 2/3)

  • Hey, tonight I was re-organizing some Rigs and I found 2 of them I did last year that You May find iteresting.

    Basically I've Profiled the Same thing in the same way; the second profile soon after the first, with out changing anything but it came out 2 Clearly Differnts Profiles.

    I've Just uploaded on RE so that You can Play with them and Get What I mean.


    The only difference is that the one of them has been profiled Selecting ''Distorted'';

    the other one has been profiled Selecting ''Clean''

    (of course I mean at the step just before pushing 'Start Profiling', Profiling Assintant 2/3 to be clear)




    The Profile closer to the original sound is the one I got when Distorted was selected.

    Actually the Sound of the amp was Not a Totally Clean sound, in my ''codification sytem'' I call it cl+ that means, a clean Plus, Cleanish, close to break-up, Dirty but not yet Crunch (that would be cr )

    the Amp actually was a Marshall JCM Slash (2555SL) Modified with a Totally Separate Clean Channel based on a Fender Twin (or so).

    In tha Amp's 'Comment' file You can See the Settings:

    Master Volume at 5

    Presence at 8

    Volume at 5

    Treble Bass and Middle at 7

    Here's a Pic


    This Head was connected to a Two Notes Torpedo Captor 16, than the Cab+ Mic part was a Preset of Wall of Sound: a Marshall 1960 AV (4x12 with V30) with a 57 and a 121.

    Same setting, nothing changed between the first and the second Profile, nor the level in the Plug-in, Daw...

    and I'm pretty sure I've set to 0dB the Return Level of the KPA (Profiling Assintant 2/3)


    SO. Said That, Please Test them and Let me have Your Opinion on this.