each commodity always find its own customer , good luck !
(just guessing , you bought that one with tuner ? )
As I said , no any guitar lineup in history made so many angry , cheated and disappointed customers .
Personally , I tried about 11 of them , in a hope to find one decent .
No way , they all were the worst piece of wet plank I had ever tried in my life .
A big part of guitarist and dealers audience , more or less think the same .
Just google "2015 Gibson the worst guitar ever " or something similar , and you will find out thousands of pages of not so nice reviews and direct complains to the new ceo , who seems to be dead serious in his intention to destroy legendary brand once forever.
there is one small example :
https://www.ultimate-guitar.co…rs_think_theyre_crap.html
For those lazy to read links there is few lines :
"The bottom line for me is this: I'm done buying new Gibson Guitars. In my opinion the company has become very exploitative of their customer base and is experimenting and destroying perfection. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. The world is full of great used pre bad decision Gibson.
"Another comment from a music-store worker was packed with the same vibe, saying,
"We sold Martin, Taylor, Fender, Huss & Dalton (custom acoustics from Stanton, VA) and for a short period, Gibson. The shop stopped carrying Gibson for the exact reason you have written here. The quality was crap and working with them was a nightmare."Even after we stopped carrying Gibson, we would have people bring them in, brand new, to be setup. The tuners on the $1,000+ models were as cheap as the Chinese knockoffs. The necks were incredibly off and difficult to keep straight. The frets needed a level & dress from day 1."
Another customer comment reads: "I have an early '90s SG. I would never buy another Gibson, I'd rather buy a knockoff and modify it to my liking (which I have) than spend $4,000-5,000 on a robot-made Les Paul. They are worth maybe $400 at most.
I think $400 is a little bit too optimistic ,