Posts by Dlaut

Quote from Wheresthedug

I don’t think that’s necessarily correct. If I understand what CK is saying the imprints will sound like the original speaker in that cabinet. For example, a V30 in a Mesa Thiele will sound Duffy to a V30 in a Marshall or Fender cab. Therefore, a V30 imprint will sound like a V30 in the same cabinet. Rather than the Konrad needing a specific style of cabinet to sound like a V30.

That seems to be the idea but how it works in practice remains to be seen. Given Kemper’s track record though I have high hopes for this 😁

I agree with you. However few Oxford, Celestion Blue, or other iconic speakers are used in a ported cabinet. So, as I mentioned, they would not necessarily sound bad. Rather, different than intended. Since the speaker makes more difference in the overall sound than the amp driving it, changing the response will affect the way the profile is presented.

In other words, don't expect that a great profile of an old Fender tweed amp will sound as authentic with the Kone in a ported cabinet, as opposed to a sealed Kabinet.

Quote from Hurricane

As I understand your explanations, it's no Problem to Change from the EVM12L in my Thiele-1x12"-cabinet to the Kemper-Kone. It will be very interesting for me to compare the result to a Kemper-Kabinett.

I think that due to the port in the cabinet, the speaker response will be different than what the Imprint was designed for. As a result, the sound will differ from the ideal that Kemper designed to. This does not mean that it would sound bad, per se, but less like the chosen speaker.

I have stated before, and remain convinced that the ability to morph between 2-rigs will become a reality with the current hardware.

I'm supremely disappointed in the lack of support for my Psion 5.

Quote from sebikummer

Hi everyone,

shouldn't it be possible to use to Profiler to do the same like this device "Tone dexter"?

https://audiosprockets.com;

https://www.thomann.de/gb/audi…CJsYW5ndWFnZSI6ImVuIn0%3D

So putting an acoustic guitar pickup signal into the Kemper input, engaging the Profiler Mode, and having a good microphone taking the "acoustic" sound of the guitar into the alternative input.

Listening to the differences between pickup sound and microphone sound should lead to a "profile" that makes a "like microphoned" sound out of the pickup sound.

What do you think? For me it would be a game changer, using the kemper for this !

Let's find out if this would be of interest for others as well.

Best,

Sebastian

Display More

I actually think it could be done....whether it would infringe on the Tone Dexter patents is another matter.

The tone Dexter uses a microphone input from an external mic as it's reference, not noise as the Kemper does, so I don't think it would be *that* difficult for the Kemper to do.

Yes indeed! +1

Fane

Altec from the Allman Brothers days

... And, to echo digbob every Scumback

JBL 12" & 15"

Celestion Silver

Quote from ckemper

Talking about dual amping or parallel effects routing. We have a unique feature set that is relating to the serial signal flow as it is. That is „condition-free spillover“ of the DLY and REV module, individual output sources such as Stack, Mod, Dly&Rev wet - and especially MonitorCabOff, to switch off the cabinet solely for the Monitor Output and run a real guitar speaker through the power amp. Those features can be set globally, without tweaking every individual rig.

We know that a very large part of our customers utilize and enjoy these features. With dual amping or parallel effects routing those features are not possible, because there would be no determined points in the signal flow any more.

What do you think?

CK

Display More

I think I would like to see morphing between 2 different amps 😉

That would provide a fine solution for 80% of us.

I predict that Kemper's next generation of electronics, either replacements for their current crop of equipment, or a new floorboard, will be made in China. Manufacturing in Germany is just too expensive.

Ron Ellis pickups.

I would like to see this too please!

Quote from hjscheffler

yes-that is the one

Does that release also fix the disabled morphing?

Quote from hjscheffler

this is a bug that somehow slipped through the betatest. Our developers are already aware of it.

That's great! How about the elimination of the morphing parameters? Have you identified that one too? TIA

Quote from TomR

As far as I can see morphing has not been changed on my performances. But I did not check all settings before/after the update.

Tom,

Did you update from the last "Release Version" or from one of the Betas?

Quote from V8guitar

TBH This is really just another cheeky way to ask the Kemper team for a wireless remote solution!!!!

I believe that the *wireless remote* will be released soon after they perfect the wireless transmission of electrical power.

Quote from LegendaryV

I’m unaware of the impact.

But, let’s be fair. The kemper release is a major release adding brand new reverbs that we’re not contemplated when those patches were released. In fact, some of them were profiles released when they were “hacking” things together to try to achieve the tones you now can by default.

Line 6 would break stuff just because they were unbreaking something somewhere else. Minor releases would render whole workflows useless and it would be unrelated to net new functionality.

For reference, I also asked the same question on another group. There are indeed issues with the update.

https://m.facebook.com/groups/…malink&id=552583978584308

ckemper , Burkhard

So, I'm confused. I have read a number of instances where updating to the most recent release version has destroyed morphing in rigs and/or performances. I've also read where the reverbs in every rig/performance have been rendered useless with regard to their settings. Is this indeed the case?

Will, for example, Brian Carl's "Together" performances need to be updated to be fully functional? How about the Tone Junky performances, Dan Lombardi's swells, shimmer and Freeze, all of Troy Trahan's performances, etc? I'm not trying to be overly dramatic - I just want to understand what I'm up against going forward with the new 5.7 release version.

Thanks in advance!

Incidentally, That's why I only install "Release Versions". Also, this is why I gave up on Line 6 and didn't buy an AxeFx....I don't want to have to update every stinkin' patch every time they issue a firmware/software update.

Quote from ToneDeaf

Lol, but she could hear with her finger!

.....further substantiation of the notion that "tone is in the fingers"

.....but, I predict that it will come in time.