honestly, to me that sounds like a 'I want more' request' since I can't figure out a (real world) scenario where it's absolutely necessary to have two fx in 'X'.
please elaborate.
Don, I´ll explain.
Sometimes I use FRFR as Yamaha DXR10 with (cab on), sometimes I just want to put KPA to Mesa 20/20 poweramp + guitar cab (cab off). Also other stuff.
My need is to have very flexible eq after stonestack to compensate sonic differencies, similar as studio eq in KPA is, so I have used Studio EQ in a X-slot.
BUT: I dont want to sacrifice one slot to that purpose cause I need also other effects!
SO: if it would be possible to have eq AND some other effect in a same time, say, in X-slot, then it doesnt matter at all
ANYWAY: the basic problem that drive me to my request is that OUTPUT EQ IS TOO ROUGH, I cant boost/cut the exact frequencies I need to do.
There should be possibility to tweak q-parameter, and frequencies.
It feels ridiculous to have to put some other devices to x-slot´s effect loop or between KPA and poweramp (many seems to do that, you can see it in a forum) cause KPA
is programmable computer based unit where it shouldnt be problem to take it a bit further in a way I explained....
CK comments recently in one thread that he doesnt see any reason to keep eq in a x slot all the time...unfortunately I can see because of poor output eq´s.
FINALLY: if it is possible to do combination as "eq and something" in one slot, why it isnt good idea to continue developing that kind of twins more?
Really hope you can follow me...
EDIT: Please look at here, thats very true what has been said in a thread -but in that way you really havent slots anymoore for effects needed:
www.kemper-amps.com/forum/inde…page=Thread&threadID=5892