Posts by loosigoosi

Best of all, a MIX % control.

Dealing with a MIDI guitar controller, and two signals (electric + piezo) from same guitar, I see that the use of the return and alternative input is a little tricky.

If you connect the MIDI controller or expander to the return + aux you need to insert an Fx loop stomp if you want to mute or mix the ouputs. But, when you set the FxLoop to off, this lead to the input signal reappearing, as the fx loop was not present.
Therefore we cannot use a remote controller switch to select which sound we want to ear in the Main out (electric signal coming pre-Fx Loop or acoustic/expander post Fx Loop. The only way is using a MIDI control change to drive the Mix parameter of the FxLoop, but the Remote doesn't send MIDI, at the moment.

[edit] Not secondary, any signal inserted in an FX Loop is affected by the CAB simulation.
Another scenario is to mix a piezo signal. Inserting it in an FX loop will introduce unwanted CAB sim.

It would be preferable that (when no FXLoop are present in the chain) the level of the AUX input was stored in a per-rig parameter rather than a global Output parameter.

Thanks.

http://elitecoreaudio.com/stor…-through-panel-mount.html

Mounting this on the rack case, connecting it to the kpa using a short ethernet patch cable.

[edit] Sorry for duplicated reply, I did not read entire thread.

The answer is no.
When you recall a preset it overwrites all parameters, so if you have tweaked something after saving that preset it will be lost and overwritten by the values in the preset.
Not a good thing.

Quote from flyingheelhook

securing at a gig is your responsibility not Kemper's.

Responsibility?? It sounds like to say that protect the access to your computer is your responsibility, not Microsoft's, so why Microsoft should provide a password protection for it?

In any case, what kind of noise would create to anyone the presence of an optional PIN to save rigs on usb key???

When you save or recall a preset for OUT and IN and SYSTEM you store or recall the values for ALL parameters. If you have a customizable list of parameters to save as preset you can recall it without alter other parameters that can change along time.

So if you want to store the Monitor EQ only, as you want to use with a particular Cab, you don't overwrite new settings for (example) the Main EQ.

Sorry for poor English.

This behaviour affects any preset system, and the solution is providing a customizable list of parameters to save, instead of storing all parameters together.

Hello,

every tyme the contest changes, I need to set a lot of parameters in a lot of System/Rig/Output/Input pages.

Would be a good help to have a customizable preset list, in which we add a number of options from a list and we store the desired value.
So when we want change our base setup we can recall a single preset that sets up different options in different option pages.

Not so easy to implement, but a very, very, very useful feature, IMHO.

Thanks

Hello,

when I play live I like to have a good pure cabinet sound in my passive guitar cab (Monitor Cab Off) but if I set the Pure Cabinet to 10 the sound is affected in the Main Out (to the mixer) too. This is not a good choice. I would like an option to enable/disable Pure Cabinet on Main Out.

Cheers.

Flavio

+1

Best setting for DXR10 is to buy a DXR12

Please add the possibility to make the tip pressure of the exp pedal acting in latch mode, this way:

- press the pedal in tip position activates the wah and it remains active, so we can control the wah
- press again in the tip de-activates the wah, and the wah-to-volume function makes the pedal acting as volume pedal.

In that way, we can stitch a rubber shim under the pedal pad tip, so that a huge pressure on the tip will activates the wah, same as real wah pedals.

I think this is the only real useful way to control the wah/volume swap using one only pedal.

Probabilmente il Proel è fuori standard, ma credo che il problema non fosse inerente alla linearità dei pot.

Purtroppo non c'è storia, con il behringher, di far funzionare il looper, per questioni tecniche (tipo di messaggi MIDI e impossibilità di programmare l'Uno4Kemper nemmeno per normali messaggi MIDI). Per il resto è più il lavoro di aprire la pedaliera e richiuderla che non il costo irrisorio del chip...

Quote from Ingolf

Which condititons exactly?

I don't know exactly, deep and better investigation is required, but I confirm that in a randomly choosed rig the big lag is present if the Transpose is set in the stomp X and not present if the Transpose is set in the stomp A. So we need to discover what make the difference.

If this behaviour is coming from some bug, the conditions could be anything external factor, not the rig itself. A laggy rig on my unit could be a good sounding rig on another unit.
To make some comparison, I must post a laggy rig and a recording of his sound, so that another user can test it and hear the effective entity of the lag.

A lag-sounding rig from RE for me is "b3 Clean - SM57" by JayCee

Under some conditions, there IS a big lag, way more than 20 ms. I confirm.

Found the solution in another post:

Transpose in Stomp X = big lag
Transpose in Stomp A = NO lag

Just tried this and it works!

Quote from Kempermaniac

Make sure Transpose is PRE stack in stomp A.

GOT IT!

It seems that in the stomp X there is delay, not in stomp A.

thanks!

This happens me too. A sort of slapback delay. Very bad mess playing sequential notes.

Scanned all factory rigs, but no JC120 found...

Quote from Arne

If you drag multiple performances from the Local Library to the Profiler, where should they go? Automatically overwrite the Profiler content? Fill up the empty programs only? Start overwriting performances beginning from the line the mouse pointer is at? There is no obvious solution, different users will expect different behavior.
Arne

OK, but: if I select a bunch of performances in the Profiler view and I drag it to move it I expect that the Profiler content will reflect this operation. What I do in the profiler view of RM must be ever what I want to see in the profiler content. The duplicated names are permitted in the profiler content, so why does not in the library?