I'm speaking to my friends the same way as you, I suppose.
And there would still be a collective "experiencing a concert event", just a bit different.
Just thinking outside the box and the technical possibilities to achieve my outlined scenario are just around the corner.
Reminds me of a silent disco. You take the headphones out and there’s few dozen people singing out of tune at the top of their lungs and that’s it. ?
I hope I'll see Kempers implemented in venues I play at before I retire from gigging.
Seriously, this is the future IMO plus in-ear-monitoring not only for musicians but for the audience as well.
How you gonna speak to your friends? It seems like a very isolated, anti social experience.
Not for me.
I’m still blown away by all of this... 
What are you guys going to do when this editor virtual tailgate party is no longer relevant? I honestly think some of you will miss the play-by-play speculation as you've grown used to it in a Stockholm syndrome kind of way.
Use it endlessly!
6 more days maximum guys !!! It comes very close !!!!
Hope so.....
Ruefus Well... yea, I already said I had..
Anyway. I’ve stated my opinion. I’ve no problem with anyone having theirs. I apologise for derailing this for a page or so and will happily get back to the topic.
A great many people who use the internet do not have a computer other than their phone, especially in developing countries. The heaviest users are the young and their main sites are social media. Anyone using a KPA needs a computer to upate the KPA OS and to use Rig Manager. So everybody here (ie registered users) has at least access to a computer and may well use the forum from the same computer that runs Rig Manager and that they access the user downloads from Rig Exchange and Kemper support. The 78% stat is not relevant to this user group.
Sure. no one is saying that people don’t have both, or they don’t use a computer too, but how many of those laptops or computers use built in speakers?
I see nothing to disprove that most people, not just here, use phones to access platforms, listen to some random A/B and then argue over the sounds they heard on their phone, tablet, or laptop speakers.
Basically. Yea.
Show me the government stat which states that 78% of all users who access this forum do so using their phone or tablet.
No, you show me that all the studies and research that prove that smart phones are by far the most used device to access the internet is somehow not relevant to this forum. I’ve got the evidence to back my argument up. Do you?
Where are the stats that show most people who access this forum do so using their phone?
Lol okay.
I can't remember the last time I accessed this site via anything but my phone.
I know. Everyone uses their phone these days. I checked a government study and it showed that in the UK 78% of all internet access is now done via a smart phone.
I just don’t find the debates based on the judgements that are made through such poor listening devices to be useful.
Just because you primarily browse using your phone or tablet doesn't mean most people do.
Well, they do. It’s indisputable.
I bought the Grab & Go and Crank & Go packs.
Will give them a go at the weekend.
Any favourites for medium gain/crunch type sounds? 
Also, I should say that we should go back to the topic. So editor? In the next 1hr 9 mins??? 
For critical listening, why use a phone speaker if you have access to monitors?
Exactly. I wouldn’t. And I rarely browse on anything but my phone or tablet, so when these A/B tests come up, I’m not gonna go home and fire up my monitoring setup, or remember to listen to an A/B test hours later where I don’t know the bias of the poster or the way it was really recorded or the possible agenda, so I don’t bother to listen to them.
What I was originally saying was, most people listen through their iPhone speakers and then have 50 pages arguments about what they heard through those shitty speakers, and I can’t see the point of it.
You mentioned "best amp sounds", so I assumed you were referencing audio, in which case you can listen through whatever you want. In terms of convenience though, I find an editor essential, whether it's for the KPA or Axe-Fx, but that's me.
I wouldn’t judge an amp or a clip or anything through the speakers in my phone, is what I’m saying, which is where I’d most likely be listening to those A/B tests, which (with no offence meant) I find largely pointless for me.
I want the unit in my rehearsal space, with my band, or through my monitors at my desk to track guitars with. Anything else doesn’t give me a proper gauge of the thing.
In a blind audio test, I'd bet you couldn't tell the difference. I digress, though.
It’s not all about that. Its about what it’s like through monitors in front of me, or behind me with my band. I don’t give much thought to blind tests through iPhone speakers anyway. But you’re right, we digress.
I own both and disagree. Do you (or have you) own(ed) any of the Axe-Fx models? I own the Kemper and have owned the Axe-Fx II(and now the III). I've personally posted numerous blind tests in which I captured the cab section of the Kemper using the Axe-Fx's built-in IR capture utility and compared Axe-Fx amp models to their Kemper profile equivalents using the same cab and the results were made to sound identical. In fact, in some cases I preferred the Axe-Fx II amp models specifically because they didn't exhibit any of the high end raspiness inherent in some Kemper profiles, though one of the advantages of owning a Kemper vs. Axe-Fx (aside from the ability to profile real amps) is having access to amps that aren't otherwise modeled in the Axe-Fx, though the Axe-Fx's Tone Matching feature often does an excellent job of replicating many of them.
Yea I had the Axe FX 2 and an AX8. I always came back to the Kemper, even if some of the effects are lacking.
What I was saying was largely tongue in cheek, but I still stand by my opinion that the Kemper has the best amp sounds of any digital unit available.
