Display More
In this thread there's actually two that I'm aware of that do't own the KPA, but had to sign in this forum for no other reason but to defend the AXE FX by insulting others only and not to participate in any serious discussion. If you happen to own the AXE FX II, then that's great, it might be good tool for you, but it's not intended to be accurate as I pointed out in the above post that you choose to ignore all what was in it and choose to take a personal jab at me by addressing one of my comments.
The subject matter of this thread is how uninformed buyers, who don't realize that they purchased the AXE FX that will never be an accurate modeler, expecting it to be an accurate modeler and celebrating with every firmware update how close it has become.
You gotta admit this is funny that anyone who has bought the AXE FX and is celebrating accuracy with every firmware clearly has bought the wrong product. I'm not a fan of the Kemper or a fan of anything but I read both manuals, the AXE FX's and the Kemper's before I purchased the Kemper because I wanted an accurate modeler and I don't want to spend all that money on a modeler that's "not a modeler in the Strict sense" and that "does not attempt to model any effect exactly." Of course these nut jobs have no legs to stand on or nothing to hang their hats on except personal attacks. Instead of personal attacks, why can't they be civilized and address the actual topic. If anyone wants accuracy, they buy the Kemper and if they choose to be misinformed thinking they're buying accuracy then they can go with the AXE FX.
That is my opinion and I believe I made and provided fair documentation to support it and I haven't seen anywhere or heard from anyone anything that shows the AXE FX to even be considered a contender when it comes to accurate amp modeling except for personal attacks and crying fowl.
When someone buys the wrong product and has to emotionally defend his purchase, it seems that we end up with very angry folks who don't want to admit that they bought the wrong product.With sharing my experience and research, I would be very happy to know that I have saved any number of guitar players who value modeling accuracy from making the wrong decision.
This clearly isn't even debatable, as can clearly be seen and I don't know in how many ways can someone point the obvious except to say: RTFM before you buy the wrong product.let me spell it out to you one last time with some help for the AXE FX manual regarding AXE FX.
"It's not a modeler in the Strict sense" it's how some engineer thought the amps should sound like, and it's not about accuracy. It can be made to sound good after intensive labor and technical knowledge but it's not accurate. You want accuracy, buy Kemper and forget about the editing, leave that to the engineers and you will enjoy much more time playing not editing parameters that the average guitar player can't understand.
ok...you made your point over and over and over. we get it -you dont like the axe and you think axe owners are flakes. you should go play your kemper and quit worring about the axe forum. im just trying to figure out why you are putting so much negative energy on this. this whole thread was stupid to begin with, making fun of people. yea, it was a hoot. you know, nothings going to change. i have both axe and kemper. i like both tools. i agree that some guys sound silly with their fanboy crap over there but ive seen it here too. and apperantly it sounds accurate to the axe guys. so whatever works.