Thank you David!
Posts by Monkey_Man
-
-
Thank you Thomas!
EDIT:
The 2nd and 6th links are the same mate.
-
The solo sound reminds me of a tone I employed alot gigging in the late 80’s. I used to have a complex rack but at the heart of it was an ADA MP-1.
I've always loved the sound of that thing David.
-
Now that's pop brother.
-
-
I completely agree with this. Those profiles, especially one in particular, has been saved in my Kemper for years. Looking forward to trying these tomorrow. I have all of your profiles from RE saved in Rig Manager on my Mac. Thank you again!
... and I completely agree with this Trey!
-
Nice riff and unexpected changes Brother Per.
-
Paul nailed the melody really-nicely I feel.
Solo was awesome, as you'd expect.
I was disappointed that the lead was so-dry 'though. Heck, even just a little delay would've helped IMHO.
-
Awesome David!
As I've said many times before here in the forum, your older '59 RR Profiles are favourites of mine. Great "grainy" vintage vibe.
Thank you so much mate.
-
Your stage is a huge step up from the Boss GT1000 bro'.
Welcome and enjoy Eric!
-
Welcome from up over.
Loving the Kemper, exceeded my expectations for sure
I always love to hear this mate.
-
Guidorist, Top Jimi and Pete's Profiles are 3 I can think of that include both studio and merged of each profile - if you have any of their packs, compare studio to merged versions, there is a difference - of course, depending on your pickups etc, the merged ones might work better! But the point is there is a difference in sound, which I assume has to be something to do with how the Kemper separates the cab from the studio profile to add to the DI to generate the merged one. And given that, I suspect that studio profiles are a slightly "purer" representation of the originally captured tone. It is mentioned in the descriptions to some of Pete's packs that he includes both because of this difference, and have definitely read others saying the same, tho can't remember exactly who or where.
In theory they shouldn't sound any different 'though.
I wonder if the differences peeps hear could be attributed to subtle changes in amp settings, mic positioning (a small bump even) or even tubes' warming up more.
The manual states:
Do not touch the controls of the amp after capturing the Direct Amp PROFILE, as both PROFILEs, and thus the eventual Merged PROFILE, must be based on the same original amp sound.
-
I have heard it said (or rather, seen it written!) by various profile makers that merged profiles don't sound exactly the same as studio profiles
I'm not aware of this mate.
I've also heard it said that it's better to do dedicated DI profiles because the merging process changes the Di slightly. In theory, I don't see why this would be the case, given how merged profiles are generated.
I too can't see how it would change the DI component.
-
I'm just across the ditch here in NZ
Finally means "across the dutch" of course.
Welcome from Melbourne bro!
-
Only took you 10 years to introduce yourself?
Better late than never brother.
Welcome!
-
Thank you for the reassurance Brother Per.
-
I lost the ability to sing falsetto 20 years ago as a result of health deterioration.
I'm still devastated about this as it was a huge "weapon" for me, vastly extending my range and broadening the spread in harmonies. I could sing in the register "flawlessly" so it was literally a second voice.
A bit tough to read what you guys have been saying but I'm very-happy for you.
-
That's absolutely-bangin' man!
-
Me likey Brother Per.
Very-catchy mate.
-
The clean bass is panned 30% right so the mix sounds wider...
I wouldn't make this your M.O. if I were you brother. For creative effect once in a while, sure, but otherwise definitely not.
