Welcome, Thorsten!
Can't wait to hear those profiles 'cause they'll represent the sound you've developed over the years - your live tones, yes?
Yes!
Welcome, Thorsten!
Can't wait to hear those profiles 'cause they'll represent the sound you've developed over the years - your live tones, yes?
Yes!
Very good effort, Thomas!
Beefy sound too. Yngwie would be proud.
Welcome, Mat!
Look forward to the reports...
Thank you!
Can't get my mitts on these puppies yet. Latest I've got of yours are the Deluxe 1A and 1B rigs, and I've just updated the RE list.
Seems I'm always a little ways behind down under... sometimes a long ways, so to speak...
Awesome. You must be wrapped, mate.
I've got a Suhr Custom on order.Modern in black with scraped binding,silver etched name on black headstock , Pau Ferro fingerboard on mahogany ( 16 inch radius) set neck and black mahogany body.Pretty much the Guthrie electronics spec. with the coil split SSV , ML & SSH+..They'll be making it in July...cant wait !
Oooh... please do tell us all how it feels, bends and plays when it arrives, Robman!
The man's got taste.
... or for it to be confiscated altogether.
Yes it does, like sambrox said it make some street fighter II sounds, street fighter II turbo is one of the game I played more one my SNes !!
Will make a little video soon to show this essential feature !!
Yes! Can't wait, Pixelman.
When I first saw your guitar, I imagined Steve Stevens-style machine-gunning by way of hammer-fisting those buttons... with 8-bit explosions!
Doable, I'm hoping...
Sorry Nicky, but I just bought this :
[Blocked Image: http://image.4sound.com/i/142825/Fender-Custom-Shop-69-Stratocaster-Heavy-Relic-RW-Silver-Sparkle-Demodeal-4Sound-Koebenhavn-457619.jpg]Custom Shop with Abby pickups. Couldn't resist, they'd knocked 2272 Aussie dollars off the asking price!
I was about to start adding second weekly appointments... until I read that you're $2272 better off!
If you can keep up this earning-money thing when you acquire guitars, your addiction will be reduced to being a moot point!
Hang on... D'Oh!
No apology necessary, deadpan. Thank you, man.
Dude, I think you've captured the soul of the Axe, whatever that is.
Very good job, bro'!
Thank you for paying attention to my original request, guys; I really appreciate it.
The focus of the thread morphed into a detailed debate that strayed far beyond the simple implementation I've long been hoping for.
The bottom line is that I believe this ability will make browsing easier and less fiddly.
LOL indeed!
I think it's to do with the new Commercial Profiles Announcements forum guidelines, Zap
Yes, I figured it must be too, Sam.
Would be helpful if the board's software allowed the automatic limiting of the count for titles to be specified uniquely for each sub-forum. I wonder if this is possible or whether it'd be necessary for a request to be submitted to the relevant parties for the feature to be implemented. The K Team™ would know...
That reminds me: I did mean to say God bless, mate.
The M.O. in that situation is to tap the mic and ask, "Is this thing on?".
So glad you like our home so far. Why not have a coffee? Guido's offering them for the price of a couple o' bananas.
That'd make me a naughty boy 12 times a year, Gianfranco.
Off to flog myself now...
Ha ha ha!
You know, there's been a bit of talk about addiction in my neck of the woods recently in the media, and the consensus of real-world workers in the field is that only cold turkey works properly; the concept of gradual weaning is doomed to failure... generally speaking.
With this in mind, if I were a mod, I'd ban you from this bloody thread!
Oh, and yeah, Suhrs really do rock (referencing that conversation today in another thread), but I didn't tell you that.
Yeah, that's 'cause they'll cancel each other out when summed to mono (such as when played back through a single speaker).
You could try a pitched signal panned to the other side, nightlight, with a slow, sine-wave-style modulation applied nice and shallowly, so that the net effect is neither sharp nor flat. To take it further, you could pass, say, the right side dry on to the next slot and modulate that with an inverted copy of the left side's mod settings, so that when it swings sharp on one side, it's flat on the other. All pitch-mod points along the timeline would therefore result in net-zero deviation from the original pitch.
"Random" mods to both sides could sound pretty cool too, but unforeseen cancellation will occur at "random" points when summed to mono.
This is just theory off the top of my head, and I've no idea how well the result would survive mono summing. I've got a repository of this sort of stuff that I've been carrying there to try out once I eventually start recording after well over 20 years' break.
What's that, I hear my fellow Kemperites shouting? I've a suppository in my head, and that's why I'm such a dumb ass? Yeah, I know.