I can’t see that. Surely all of that is already captured in the profile already.
Sure.
But I see a lot of direct profiles in the RM. I could imagine that this would be interesting for a lot of folks.
I can’t see that. Surely all of that is already captured in the profile already.
Sure.
But I see a lot of direct profiles in the RM. I could imagine that this would be interesting for a lot of folks.
Following the kemper logic after the kone I could imagine a power amp sim with the most important power tube,rectifier etc simulations. Who knows..
Display MoreIts really interesting isn't, because both leave loads of questions:
1) Jim's vid he used a looper to take out variability. That in itself makes sense but also takes out any interaction
2) Jim never tried different tubes (if I remember) - I can imagine a worn tube will sound different to a new one. In other words, the tubes themselves must have a reasonably significant affect on the sound as when old or failing we can definitely hear it. I do wonder whether the switchable part of the amps are really mimicing changes in bias. Therefore I'm not surprised when AOT actually changed the valves that they sound different. They didn't answer why just that it did.
3) Jim's video didn't answer - why do the same amp, particularly vintage ones, sound different anyway. Same circuit, same tubes but still do sound different, some sweeter than others...I can guess but...
I go back to what I said. I don't think anyone is saying it has no impact...the debate is how big...I think it's the law of diminishing returns. For some people it will mean everything (Eric Johnson springs to mind) to others it's how you feel - which can be why one day you think your amp sounds amazing and the following day duff.
The only thing that changed is how you felt...
Curious!
I still think there are little gremlins in each amp, messing around with some parameters to just screw us over...it's how I explain I don't sound like Van Halen...
Same amps from the same series sound different. with the same cab/speakers..
Same guitars from the same series sound different..with same woods and same hardware..
So where does the sound come from;
Steel,wire,wood,speakers..room..rust,dirt,attrition,cables,heat,cold,malfunctions,tubes,humidity,batteries,voltage...fingers,ears,muscles,daily condition,taste,smell,drugs,booze,adrenaline and a lots of testosterone if you're a young lad..bad karma good karma.. positive vibes,negative vibes.. jing & Jang.. I could go on for ever..
So where does the sound come from;;;
The answer is very simple:
Τά πάντα ρεΐ.. or as you would say: No man ever steps in the same river twice..for it's not the same river and he's not the same man..
If we accept that we will play more and tweak & talk less.
I'm not going to talk about a video you haven't watched and listened to. Use your ears and develop your own opinion based on that.
He never says no difference. It's all about what makes a noticeable difference based on your ears.
Actually like most other musicians I use my ears and don't need clickbait videos to tell me where the sound of amps and guitars come from.
So.. In some way we agree I guess..
I only implied the arrogance because you implied he was just some internet shill looking for clicks. I don't think he deserves that.
Is this not the same guy who implied in another video that "wood doesn't matter";
If he is (and I believe he is) this guy I will not apologize.
It simply can't be that nothing really matters in the tube amp with respect to the sound, otherwise you would simply need to tweak a
fender black face to get a Mesa triple rectifier sound. As I said, I have actually been in a room with both these amps and can unequivocally say that it is not possible. It doesn't matter if you send the output of each amp to the same cab either (I have done that just to be silly).
All these kind of videos say nothing about tiny little details and 00000,1% differences which are "the whole world" to most players.
Maybe if they (all.these guys trying to say amps and woods and "all these things don't matter" would play brothers in arms or the intro of the dark side of the moon we would hear these differences.
But there is ofcourse a problem..
Strumming three chords says nothing . It is crazy even to discuss this.
And yet Eric Johnson claims that even the battery in his pedal does "the trick".
Go figure..
Actually it was me who did not claim anything yet I was accused of being "arrogant".
You somehow missed that..
I think the point of his videos are to let people hear differences rather than talking about them. I rate his skills and ears over most people, so waving a dismissive hand at him is a bit arrogant I think. 🙂
It is arrogant to claim that myriads of (legend) players who work for decades on their sound are all idiots.
Tone is at the end of the chain. And only there.
Ofcourse.
I have met so many folks who never thought a second about their vibrato/bending (and sounded like that) telling me about "where the sound comes from" ..
2) Any differences I think we all knew were subtle when it comes to tube bias and even tubes. Strumming a couple of chords is not going to show that BUT I also think so much is our perception than reality - we can't always trust our ears either
Finally someone mentioned this..
Sorry folks.. imo all these videos are click bait. Funny,entertaining etc but they say absolutely NOTHING.
I was a teenager in the 80's, so I went through the first wave of keyboard music and love it. 🙂
It was the time of "more is more". Decadent innocence..MTV.. And ofcourse there was no fear of kitsch and hyperbole cheesiness.
But then came Kurt Cobain and killed it all..including the bombast keyboard sounds,shred guitar and himself..
Just because something can be done, doesn't mean it should, even in the hands of one of the greatest guitar technicians in history. I prefer him on guitar (and when he's not cramming 32 notes into every bar).
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
The time has come to do it.
Some things.. we just can't stop..
I can't see a single reason why I would ever want to use a guitar synth when both on stage and in the studio I can grab any usb keyboard and trigger a VSTi or even internal sounds.
I do use a Boss SY200 to layer my guitar sounds in my band, there's a few moments in the set when the synth is louder than the guitar but it's still all pads/fuzz-octave stuff to accentuate my guitar parts.
Of course, your mileage may vary but outside of virtuoso playing, this tech is unlikely to have a significant impact on music.
What about live?
Display MoreI don’t know about you, but I’ve heard a lot of keyboard players doing synth leads with a guitar sound, that sound pretty convincingly. The Dream Theater guy for instance just to name a famous musician. But also strings, sax etc. etc. sounds so more realistic with a keyboard using the wheel.
In regards to the music today being dominated by synths. Yes, very true. But why should someone doing beats or electronic music in general select the guitar as a trigger, when a keyboard is far superior? As for now nothing has really changed. The choice has always been there. I tried to with the Axon, but it’s just translating so bad with trigger faults, dynamic playing etc making it weird and not very intuitive. I dumped this idea pretty fast as it easier to turn on the midi controller and experience no BS. I really see no place for this in a professional working environment in regards to beat making. For that the midi controller will be very tough to beat. Guys n gals doing that shit also tend to go the keyboard way anyway. It really makes no sense to me. I can only see it being what it has always been. A niche thing.
Stuff really has to change immensely for it to be more than a niche thing imho. Today it still isn’t near good enough. It might be someday. I’m surprised that nothing has changed with the speed of today’s technology. And then again. Why select an inferior trigger over a superior trigger? The guitar might become okay, but I highly doubt that it will become anything but an inferior trigger compared to a midi controller.
Let’s meet up in 20 years and have a beer and discuss, who was right. The loser will pay ( you of course 🤣 ).
First of all ..the beers are always on me. Old family tradition.😉
The "reason" why anyone would "need" a guitar as a trigger instrument is IMO very simple.
Everyone has one. Everyone can play a few chords on guitar. I can imagine so many situation in the studio or ofcourse on stage where it would be a huge advantage to do keys stuff with your guitar rig. A band with two guitar players using these possibilities.. easy answer,think about it..
Interesting points.
I will try to answer also point by point.
First of all,yes you can do bends and stuff with guitar synths. I am very happy in this regard with my triple play..thing is that almost all of the synth sounds I love and use were never "built" to be translated into string style playing. Ofcourse not. So even I can achieve results I really dig with my triple play there is always this 1% of things I cant do. For example I would go crazy if in the future some developer achieves algorithms with a guitar synth which can translate "all of it" what an electric guitar can do with a (let's say) moog lead or sax.For example pinch harmonics. How could this sound? Maybe interesting,wild,unexpected?
We dont know. Until yet nobody has ever tried this.
As for using a keyboard I can use ofcourse the stick/wheel for bendings/vibratos but come on..this is not the same..Also I cant replicate 100% the runs & phrasing I use on guitar.
Anyway..this for the "technical side of things".
So..yes "in the past" guitar synth was a niche thing. Prog rock. Right?
But in the past we did not have a "diminished interest" in rock music. Actually rock music was the "basic thing" with all it's different kinds. Guitar,Bass,Drums ..a sax here and there,with synths things became "more diverse" and indeed a lot of prog rock stuff appeared. Niche.
But is this the same today? I dont think so. Everything has completely changed. Kids like the sound of an guitar but it is just "one of many sounds" they grow up with. Cheap,nasty drum sounds,all forms and kinds of bass sounds,in general "leads" or "solos" are not a "important part of it" and are mostly replaced by a vocal hook or even a more hefty rap part.
Judging by what I see,what I experience seeing and listening to what the kids hear today..they have a completely different approach to sound.
If in the 80s heavy metal.was "extreme" and "aggressive " today kids think it is "lame" and lacks bass!Today heavy metal is a play ground for guitar players who truly to.be more like bass players with guitar skills.
Not to mention that all the gangsta & electronic music "done the rest" in the last 20 years. This is a fact.
Long story short electronic/synth sounds are not "niche" today. They have replaced most of what role had the traditional rock/pop instruments 1955-1990.
They are like 70%-80% of what we hear today. Most likely this will not change. Kids will do their "melange" they will mix stuff and sounds from 1955 until today. They will hear on YT Chuck Berry and one minute later Snoop Dog.
Dont forget that just now Kate Bush went into the charts again with a 40 years old song. Kids want it all and they can have it.
The electric guitar may become soon another trigger tool like the midi keyboard.
Edit
I forgot to mention that I most often use my fav profile and "mix" a little bit of a synth lead to it. And ofcourse if you use a piano sound doing the vibrato it will sound funny. I have to turn down the mix and in general it is often a "lots of work".
A more "intelligent" guitar synth would do this automatically?
Stuff like that..
Rereading my post above..did not want to sound disrespectful. I am myself one of these old lads (still with long hair getting slowly greyed out) I described above.
But the truth is yes. ..'got tired of the "cliche rock sounds" ..getting more and more "clean" with old fender profiles with some drive/fuzz/boost enjoying more and more fusion and jazzy stuff. Anyway..
New sounds should be part of the game. Not only the classical rock guitar stuff but what ever it is.
In my opinion the electrical guitar is a fantastic instrument. But is needs "new horizons" (sorry for this cliche). For many young people the sound of the electric guitar is "already old" and a part "of the past".
This is ofcourse not bad. The question is if this is enough.
I think it will become a common place to see them in future flagship multi effect units. People will want the units to have them even if they don’t use them personally much, kind of like the Steve Vai-esque wild pitch shifting stuff that’s been common in pricey all ones the last decade aren’t used regularly by the majority of guitarists.
The guitar will always be a popular instrument because of the things that it does uniquely well. But if one is looking to push the boundaries of non guitar sounds, a midi keyboard will always be a superior choice. This is due to the inherent limitations of the guitar: only six strings that can be played by four fingers in whatever combinations are physically possible given the limited stretch of a single human hand. (apologies to right hand tapping possibilities that advanced musicians can do) but the keyboard is superior note for note because one of your hands doesn’t need to be reserved for plucking the notes that you’re holding down with your other hand. You have 10 fingers on two hands and those two hands can be stretched 5 or more feet apart. It’s why you can teach a five-year-old to play single note melodies on a keyboard in a relatively short amount of time. Play the same thing verbatim on a guitar would take vastly more developed skill. Same goes with chords. You can show a person with no experience how to hold down GBD to play a G chord in 30 seconds and watch the same person struggle for weeks to learn how to play the first G chord without it buzzing.
Strings have much more ways of expression.
Vibrato & bending,doing slides..pinch harmonics.
Imagine a guitar synth which can do all these ofcourse with certain sounds (moog/lead sounds in general) .
It would be completely new way to see the guitar. Which is good to get more kids to this instrument. Guitar will not die as long as there is a way to sesperate it from old cliches ..some of which are graphic and just funny for the latest generations. Many kids I know just dont want to see 50-60 year old long haired (or what ever has left) dudes doing rock hero stuff on YT.
How so? You add some definition as you raise the gain?
This function alters the "character" of the profile.
With some profiles if you add some "definition" you will get a little bit more "beef".
I have a few profiles which sounded much better for leads/solos just adding some "definition" instead turning up the gain control.
Often I combine both functions.. a little bit more gain control and a little bit more definition. In any case I believe it is worth a try because the definition function IMO is very very interesting and important for the profiler. But it does not "the same thing" to all the profiles. Hard to explain but worth a try.
Often I also use the definition function in the amp section to get the "right" gain boost. A little bit more..worth a try..
But it depends a lot on the profile ofcourse.
Nikos I don’t know kids who play. But I know a lot of adults though and no one has this. I’ve never heard about this being normal. But that does not mean, that it isn’t. I just highly doubt that statement. I triggered Reason with my Axon. No problem there.
Like I stated earlier. The tech has been here for decades. It has always been a niche thing. I cannot see it suddenly become big. The Axon had all the boxes ticked. And to state that young people has no limits when mixing playing styles, leaves me with one question. Are you saying that people has not done this for 50 years?
To be honest I dont agree. Technology was there but it was not for everyone. It was "elite" and this because it was first of all very expensive and then ofcourse you needed a lots of knowledge and time to use it. It was never instinctive and out of the guts.
Today modern tools like the triple play are good.Better. Cheaper.Easier and most of all more "instinctive" and out of the guts.
Guitar synths should be part of the next generation guitar modelers. For me this is out of question