Posts by Kim_Olesen
-
-
An added delay parameter on the chorus would be great. Many 80s rack units had that, and as of now, impossible to replicate.
-
RosboneMako I know you were only joking, but just in case…. The kpa tech is propriety, and protected by patents, so you are not allowed to try to implement any of that tech in a plugin.
-
Who gets paid to play music in this day and age?
I do
And i guess that’s why i am so hesitant to upgrade the software. -
I could do that BUT switching from one oerformance to another is so damn (inpredictably) slow that sometimes the cc change gets processed first by the kemper, and then the pc. This “slowness” cancels the midi cc out because the program has a value for the parameter.
-
As Dynochrome puts it, a wholly clean tone is pretty rare. Many tones we percieve as fully clean, both live and in productions, are nearer breakup than we think.
-
Way to complicated to explain why, but i’d like to control the amp volume in the stack independently of it’s programmed value. And (i think) the only way to do that would be to lock it, and then control it via midi cc.
(or is it called cab volume? Can’t remember offhand) -
Simulating the knobs on an amp sounds like a good idea. But imagine now having to both learn and remember how a Vox amp's controls work versus a Marshall versus a Fender......Orange.....etc. Knobs with similar labels do not behave the same way brand to brand and even model to model.
A Vox AC30 has no middle control. What do you do about that? Some amps have two gain controls plus a master. Some don't have any. Some amps have one knob, others a bunch of them. A Boogie Mk3 has a 5 band equalizer, plus bass/mid/treble. A Boogie JP-2C has two.
IMO - it sounds like a nice idea. But the complexity added to the user experience would be catastrophic. Every time you add a new amp to the Profiler, you'll have to learn - and remember - how the controls function and interact with each other.
Screw that.I agree. People forget the difference between a profile (which is really a snapshot) and a modeller.
There is no practical or precise way to implement this.
-
Because each amp I own has its own distinct roll off point. Each one has different tone stack behaviour and frequency range.
This isn’t a case of applying a band aid ‘fix all’ situation or slapping an EQ across the outputs would even things out.
It needs sorting at source.
It’s currently not profiling the low end accurately. It’s adding something that doesn’t exist on my original amps.The refine process completely ignores the problem.
If it gets sorted out, it’s a win situation for everyone.
I think people completely forget that the sound where the mic is placed in front of a cab, is what gets profiled. Ofcourse putting your ear where the mic is, will be harmful, but really thatis where the sound of the profile originates. It’s more bassy AND trebly, right there 4-5cm from the speaker.
And yes, the output eqs is the blanket solution, and they fine for that. At least they’ve always done on my setup.
-
Why don’t you just go to your output eqs and lower the low end. I did that right from the start.
-
curser in your DAW is sitting past your volume fade on the outro when you load it up.
That’s a classic one.
-
It’s only different if you have space on. Otherwise it is the main out signal.
-
OT: Strikingly similar to the frequency response of the brilliant speaker emulation in the Marshall jmp1 midi preamp. Which incidently is where all my personal profiles is taken from.
And add to that i used a cab with vintage 30s, and untill i investigated the frequency responses i couldn’t fathom why my line signal was so true to my cab sound.
-
Been playing since i was 9. Gigging regularly since i was 11. A few months shy of 50 now so i voted 41+.
-
It’s found where you can download manuals etc.
-
Never mind. I found it.
Thread can be closed by a mod.
-
Hi there. I once had a list where i could see all the parameters and their corrosponding midi CC values. As some of you know i control some exotic parameters from “hack devices” and i feel another one coming on.
Does such documentation still excist?
-
It does not need to be a compromise. See my answer in the other thread.
-
I certainly do not agree that if it gets too loud in the inears the boost is also too loud in the FOH. That is a gig by gig decision and tends to be true the fewer instruments there are in the line up. But in a lineup with two guitarists and a keyboard player you often needs more boost in the foh than in the ears. And my own personal preference is to have only a very light boost in the inears.
So am totally with the OP here.
I simply had a hack made for this. I run from the headphone jack to a rack mixer so i am in charge of my own inear levels. AND then i have a costum box that attenuates the headphone level each time i use a lead sound. It’s a programmable midi device that regulates the kempers headphone out level on the sounds i have marked as lead.
The device to the left (above the kemper) is a global lead boost. It regulates ALL lead sounds at one turn. I need this because i play with SO many different lineups that there is no way i can know in advance what boost is needed. The device next to it is the headphone level regulator midi thingy.
-
The thing with including an audio interface option is that you have to maintain driver support too. Not sure that is domething the team would really use manpower on.