Why just not respect for everybody. For everything.
I meant that.. I wrote it differently but I didn't mean to exclude someone or something.
Sorry if I wrote it bad.
I'm so shocked that this happens in a "piece of gear" forum! And if I remember well this isn't the first time that something similar happens.
Respect for black yellow muslim jews and Monkey
I use Avalon U5
The sweetest sounding DI. It is magic:)
Perhaps you should try under the new 4.0.6, perhaps the problem vanishes by itself..
i'm playing live everyday, i wait to stop for a while to try a non official release
Now i am a little bit confused. Imo there is no trs output with 1/4 jacks on the kpa. The only use of a trs cable is the jack for a wah or expression pedal. What do you mean? The xlr outputs are symetrical and the main out 1/4 are unsymetrical.
Am i wrong?
TRS carries a stereo signal (unbalanced) only in the headphone output, for all the others ins and outs the TRS means BALANCED vs UNBALANCED signal.
1- Sometimes it gets crazy and doesn't follow the performance tempo nor the taps and blinks faster untill I recall the rig.
2- it doesn't respond (never) to faster taps, if I want I short delay I have to set it manually.
I'm on os 3.3 but was the same on 3.2.1
A Fade Out switch might be useful to me.
Dunlop dvp3 (x) is incredibly smooth and precise.
They produce a smaller version you may like.
i didn't want to spend this much but this really makes a difference in controlling volume.
I use the Strymon Mobius and Timeline and attached them on top of the Kemper with Velkro. I think the Mobius has much better modulation effects than the Kemper. I'm OK with the reverbs in the Kemper, because I don't use a lot of reverb in the style I'm playing. What I'm missing the most, is a good AUTOWAH like the EHX QTron for example. I simulated it with the wah in the Kemper, but it totally sucks. I'm quite happy with the real wah sounds in the Kemper, those are OK. I would like to see QTRON, Boss Dynamic Filter and Boss T-Wah simulations in the Kemper. I don't use distortion pedals in the Kemper. Never used them in real life either, I always let the amp do the work.
i also have Strymons like you, I tried to live with the Kemper fx but they aren't enough for my taste. Are you able to use the tap tempo on the remote to control the Strymon tempo? How do you do?
Ps To me reverb is slightly better than modulations or delays but not good if compared to Neunaber or Strymon, they don't "eat" the tone..
At least in the headphone mix.
Now, using a mono source, the aux signal is only Left or Right
+1
also a quantize option would be great.
Display MoreHi Danides,
I am not sure if I understand your issue right. I think this is simpel ? I myself have a small flight case including the Kemper and my IEM unit.
The signal chain is as follows:
Guitar > Kemper In (front)
Kemper OUT >>> Central Mixing Board (mono)
In the central mixing board I create a separate mix for my personal IEM, this sits on e.g. AUX 4
AUX 4 from central mixing panel >>> IEM unit in my flight case
And than the IEM wireless to my ears (no other monitor)
I make my own mix for my IEM with the guitar as loud as I want.
Why don't you do it this way?
Best regards,
Ed
I
I'm not using a wireless system (I dond't move much on stage))and I wouldn't use an external mixer.
other people use the internal mixer of the kemper the way I do, but I guess they use a stereo mix from the mixer so they feed L and R in the stereo panorama
Display MoreHi Danides,
You could put in for a feature request...
The alternative is that you compromise by buying a cable that splits your band mix feed to the Kemper's return and alternative input. No big shakes really, just a cable. You won't struggle to hear the mix. This way you'd get your mono mix in both ears with guitar in glorious stereo direct from the Kemper.
Don't forget to drop the guitar signal from the band mix feed or you'll get weird phasing of the guitar sound.
Go on, be daring and use one little
unbalanced signal to save yourself a long wait for a firmware update that might never happen.
Hope you get it sorted soon.
Keep us posted.
Pre-Amp
Thank you very much for your reply,
I don't know if I can split the signal with a simple Y cable without losing the balanced signal in the xlr input (sorry my english might not be good enogh). I believe the safest way would be a splitter or a DI where I use the secondary output (the link input) to feed the secondary jack input of the K. I just hoped that there was a somewhere hidden chance to do the trick in the K.
I would stay balanced as much as possible because I have many interferences on stage and I get hums and buzzs when unbalanced.
Thanks again for your kind help 
You are most welcome to block me. Right click on my name and there the option appears,
No problem, I did it already, but if you are coherent, why you edited your previous message cutting the "arrogant" part?
Anyway I hope you'll solve your problem.
Bye
Ofcourse a limiter messes with the tails. Even more so than a comp. A limiter is a comp that has a ratio that is set to infinite. As soon as i release a note the tails would become louder.
And i don't want my peaks limited in my inears. I want the difference between rhythm and lead sounds to be less than in the foh. But apart from that the sound should be unaltered. A limiter would make me play different since it would take out the dynamics.
Listen, i know you are trying to be helpful, but i do this for a living and know what i am talking about.
After a living doing this, you may now learn that everybody uses limiters and not compressors, some bodypacks have the limiter onboard and not a compressor. They might be wrong but they do it because the limiter has fast attack and release and doesn't mess too much (if set correctly) with the overall balance and tails.
Anyway your arrogance is un limited
yes, the love you take is equal to the love you make 
Display MoreAs I said before: I like the KPA's FX very much.
Others seem to wait for this magical update and then there will be the best of the industry FX right in the Kemper.
I dont think tjhis is very probable. Christoph is surely among the top notch audio programmers currently on that planet. So, this is not the problem. But for decades now I am following discussions like:
* This amp is great, but the cabs are shi**y, you have to go for this and then the combination is great
* This multi FX has excellent reverbs, but forget about the choruses
* This mixing desk has fantastic EQs, but the faders are not acceptable
* This guitar has the best tone and sustain ever, but the neck pickup MUST be replaced
...and so on, so on, so on...
I think thats just human and not always objective. Its more about brands. And its a kindof trap. Moneywise I often went into this trap - but finally discovered a super weapon against it, namely: A/B-ing! Record a track with what you call best FX in the world (it must be, was fu**ing expensive!) and then do it again with the inferior one, finetuned as close as possible to match the other.
Now for the funny part: as long as YOU will switch between those tracks and KNOWING which is which, you will clearly hear that BIG difference. If somebody else will randomly switch between A and B (blind A/B-ing) you will get lost more often than you liked to. Things are getting even worse when some decent audio engineer will do some EQ-ing on both tracks to fit a song better or to match them better.
I am a guitarist too. And I also want that big, fat, impressive, room-fllling killer sound when I play alone with my amp. But my vocalist or the other guitarist and definetly the sound engineer / producer will hate it. There are special exceptions like EVH and Jimi. But there were no second guitar player or keyboard and Jimi even sung his own stuff - and while singing he played MUCH less. In general: and many cases: less is more - in the context of a song or band. And the FX which are really needed are already there - with excellent SNR, dynamics and tone! Again: I am aware of the super heroe exceptions and special sound searchers, say Robert Frip. I am just talking about us OK-players and song- or band-servants...
Listen to mixdown videos of your favourite songs, if available. I did this for some Steely Dan songs, i.e. Many of the instruments sound incredibley whimpy - when soloed! Most guitars in most mixes got robbed of all their big, fat, air-moving low-end. There is a reason why Zappa shouted so many times: turn down that bass in your instrument...
(Now I am glad that there is no hate- or dislike-button on that forum! )
The question was "kemper fx are good enough for you?"
if the answer is yes, you don't need to spend your many words trying to convince who isn't completely happy with the Kemper fx, and explaining what is a music production. Don't feel offended if many people don't agree with your idea, have respect for others opinion.
Ok, I don't have a splitter and wouldn't use one, furthermore I would only use balanced signals and I don't think that the alt input is balanced.
I would have a function that allows me to hear a mono source in both sides, or a panpot...
Anyway thank you
Have you ever played with in ears people?
and no a comp/limiter would certainly not do the job. It would mess with the dynamics og my playing and with reverb/delay tails too. The playing would feel different to what comes out of the foh.
When you change the volumes with a pedal you are changing the dynamics too. A limiter cuts the peaks and doesn't mess with your reverb tails, it is different from a compressor.
Anyway, as I said, an overall lower volume would save your ears and your dynamics.
