I will do it now, later with 3.0.
Let you know which one cab separation colors the cab closer to the truth:) it's most likely to be the present FW.
Posts by damariachi
-
-
Ok, I'll do so! Thanks;)
-
I thought about full profiling, but then again- separation by software is not 100% correct (don't know about 3.0 firmware). Also I'm pretty sure the Vox poweramp adds color to the sound, which I would like to preserve. So , if it's possible to make IR of a cab, it has to be the same to make IR of EQ+cab..?
-
I want to achieve the same sound without carrying the Vox with me.
-
Hi guys, I managed to make additional input to my Vox AC-30TB, right between preamp and poweramp. I use it to run different preamp-only profiles from my kemper throught the Vox tube poweramp and cab. My question is - how can I profile the Vox poweramp&cab and import it as a "cab" in my kemper?
-
I think the results will be close, but version 5 is more comfortable to use. Especially saving and recalling in projects with more than one instance of ozone was improved a lot.
Thanks mate! -
I have question like this - is Ozone 5 better than 4, for tone matching purpose?
-
Yes, I noticed that too - the cabmaker is not 100% precise! I might try profiling with real amp too, my problem is I have only 1963 Vox AC-30 with master gain and no external loop, it will be hard to match high gain tones even by a long shot. Maybe some pedals in front would help..
-
Hi, I did it like that : Kemper ready profile (no effects, cab off) > DAW > Ozone 4> matched EQ > Voxengo deconvolver > IR > cabmaker > .kipr file> import back to Kemper and attach to the initial profile as cab. The results are amazing.
If someone has done both methods ( this one and with profiling), let us know which one gives better results:) -
Thanks mate!!
-
Hi, I'm registered member, but still can't find the rig/cab reference list, any help will be appreciated!