You Sir have just been wiKPA'ed
The funny thing is the guy is going to record the next album of his other band with the mighty Profiler. I hope that when he has worked with the Profiler himself he will no longer suffer from my logorrhoea kemperiensis.
Brutal. I like it. 
MMMMMMH, i think i got it worse. My wife loves the toaster for seeing me happy as a child on Christmas every time i plug my axe into the profiler. But my drummer wants me and my bandmate guitarist to pay a euro every time we say "profile" "Profiler" "Kemper" "awesome" or any other imaginable word to express our affiction. I'm about to get ruined ;(.
Display MoreThis only happens after the first time a slot has been loaded with a rig then changed to a different rig.
The slots name info was empty before the first Rig was loaded, then the slot used the Rig to add a name info
after that this name info will not be automatically changed when you load a new Rig.
If you were to name each slot say intro, verse, chorus, bridge........ then no matter what rig you chose for the slot it will keep this slot name.
Its not a Bug, just not Obvious to the user that this Info needs to be set by the user one time per performance.
This is not the problem.
You're right that the slot name will not change when you assign a different rig to a slot that has been loaded with a rig already.
I set up a completely blank performance. When assigning rigs to the first 4 slots the rigname is displayed correctly in the small tag, on slot 5 the rigname of slot 1 (which is not the same rig that is assigned to slot 5) is displayed in the tag. i just checked it again, it's clearly reproduceable. KAOS 2.2.1 release.
Can anyone check this please?
Display MoreThis only happens after the first time a slot has been loaded with a rig then changed to a different rig.
The slots name info was empty before the first Rig was loaded, then the slot used the Rig to add a name info
after that this name info will not be automatically changed when you load a new Rig.
If you were to name each slot say intro, verse, chorus, bridge........ then no matter what rig you chose for the slot it will keep this slot name.
Its not a Bug, just not Obvious to the user that this Info needs to be set by the user one time per performance.
This is not the problem.
When loading a different rig to an already assigned slot the slot tag will not change, which is intended by design.
I started with a completely empty performance, no rig assigned to any slot. When adding a rig to slot 1, 2, 3 and four the correct rigname is displayed in the small slot tag, when adding a rig to slot 5, the rigname of the rig in slot 1 is displayed. That is not by design i think.
Can someone please set up rigs in performances you have not used before in order to see if you get the same error? It does not always happen on the first performance you edit, maybe you need to set up 2 or 3 performances to get that error.
Display MoreI don't think you are following me.
I'm in Performance mode with 5 slots. I load a different Rig in each slot, by the time I get to the fourth slot, instead of showing the 4th Rig's correct name in the slot, it shows the 1st Rig's name instead.
That's not by design, because it makes no logical sense to show the wrong Rig's name.
This is nothing to do with the Performance name.
I can reproduce this issue, i'm on 2.1.1. release. Just loaded rigs into an empty performance, when coming to slot 5 the tag of that slot shows the name of the rig in slot 1, the rig name is displayed correctly in the line below the performance's name. Did not happen on the first time a performance was set up after a reboot, though. Can you please try again confirm this?
EDIT: It just happened after reboot on slot 5.
In theory, yes. But i would expect the tone to slightly degenerate in each generation that follows the first one or two as it is to be d/a'ed and then d/a'ed multiple times. This is where SPDIF-Profiling would come in handy (but how to sync three Profilers?).
Does that mean in summary that it only takes 3 profilers and a mixer to make your own multi amp profiles?
Yes, at least for doing dual amp profiles. I use my DAW as a mixer, you could apply all sorts of DSP if desired, too. Haven't done it that way yet, though. But the next time i have three Profilers at hand i will give it a try, too.
If it happens again, can you try to re-sync your Focusrite (switch Sync Source to Internal and back to S/PDIF). I've had this happen a few times with a Focusrite Scarlett 2i4 connected to a laptop.
This. Had the same issue with my Scarlett 6i6, switched the sample rate to 48kHz or sync to internal and back which solved it for me.
Amon Amarth. Saw them Wednesday on their tour start and the guitar tone was HUGE.
Maybe we can check in at Betty Ford some day to be treated. But i guess the relapse rate would be rather high...
Hola y bienvenido!
I liked the profiles of Juanma a lot, he told me he has sold his Kemper to a bandmate.
I just checked them all, and yeah, they're all dead. Could you upload them somewhere else... perhaps the rig exchange? It was very awesome of you to fulfill all those requests, btw.
Hi meambobbo,
i'll reset the links asap, the files are still in the dropbox. Taking the profiles of two profiles is done quickly as you don't have to tweak mic positions etc. I just set the relative levels of the tones to achieve the desired new tone, e.g. i took a profile of my Marshall at a low gain setting and combined it with a high gain tone of the same amp.
Thanks for sharing
I do not know of such an option. Scrolling though PrgChg# on System page 5/9 does not recall the assigned rig.
It works on this side of the Ocean
i referred to the links to my dropbox in my posts, i killed them (i think?). Do you get access, Gianfranco?
The Profiling process is aborted when no or a to low returnsignal is detected.
I think the two or even three Profilers method to get a profile containing tweaks or being a blend of two profiles will show proper results only. I'll hopefully get my greedy fingers on a third Profiler again soon, i will try to get more merged profiles as the ones i did already are quite good.
Hi and welcome! Nice man cave 
Hi and welcome to the party!
I have tried it. Basically it works, the latency compensation is very forgiving. However, the results are very off. I guess that somehow the profiling test signals are dynamically adjusted during profiling. I gave up trying then...
Same here. Tyler, thanks for saving me from spending more time on it.
