Please, if you know them, share the information!
(still waiting studio eq-like parametric implementation to monitor and main output...)
Please, if you know them, share the information!
(still waiting studio eq-like parametric implementation to monitor and main output...)
This seems to be a common misunderstanding. Many Profiler users have problems to get familiar with the sound of "real mic'ed amps".
Guitar speakers have that much highs and lows. I believe there is no single profile where the highs have been emphasized during or after the profiling. You control the highs by the angle of the microphone.
So what you get with the actual profiles is a perfect blend what producers and pro guitarists think is the right frequency responce of a mic'ed amp. We have not got a single message from the pro's that the frequency responce of our profiles are not right.
If you think the frequency responce is not right, please get used to it!
The amps on your favorite record also sound in that way, but they are embedded in the mix.
??? I think it is OK to hope more specific output eq, also with hi and low cut, because there is also people who use KPA:s main and monitor out to guitar poweramp and guitar cabinet both in mono AND STEREO. And it make no sense to sacrifice one slot to eq for that purpose.
Hmmmmm..I think this whole tread is waste of energy and time, only quesses and speculations -before Kemper team give official information about the editor.
Maybe this forever lasting speculation make it happen ..............................................................
Maybe it should be controlledchaos.bin......
I do like those China versions more in your clip...just what happens when I did have G12-t75 , made in UK and new China versions in 4x12 cab:
UK´s sounded a bit too harsh...
Looper and arpeggiator (and maybe a little bit off topic: a more versatile output eq)...
Hi, I have a 112-18 myself and I'm trying to get rid of it. 18 watts is respectable for a tube amp but if you push the amp to higher volumes with rigs of high gain amps (at rehearsal volume level) you'll find the amp breaking up too much and adding an unpleasant distortion to an already distorted (in a good sense) tone. It adds warmth to clean rigs but I'd stay away if you intend to play Harder Stuff as it will colour your tone too much.
I'm in the process of selling the atomic and buying a DXR10 or DXR8....
Just my 2 cents....
Hi! With that Atomic CLR hype all around I just wanted to let you know that two my Atomic Reactor 112-18 with speakers changed to WGS Veterans really works.
I have also Yamaha DXR-10 but I prefer Reactors.
Funny thing also is that I can use the same cabinet simulation with Reactors, DXR10 and my Adam A5x studiomonitors by just adjusting a little bit of KPA:s output eq.....
And at least having two of Reactors there is no any problems with a headroom even with clean sounds with drummer..
Same here!
The visual feedback is already there since you can see all the values you are applying. Having the curve graph would only make it better especially due to the Q-factor, making it easier to see what frequencies are you affecting with it.
Indeed!
I do like the one that's there already for quick adjustments in a new room. If anything else, I'd prefer a graphic eq.
Ok, but anyway there should be ALSO more accurate way to handle output frequencies.
And I dont see a big problem to have option to choose between graphic or parametric or whatever.
Agree that would be a nice add-on....but FOH normally have one on all channels...I would prefer it on the monitor out.
I prefer it to ALL outputs!
BTW.: Do somebody knows exact frequencies and bandwiths of existing output eq?
veus55, have you tested FCB with program like MIDI-OX (http://www.midiox.com/)?
From there you can see the midi-data FCB is sending.
When we will get similar eq as "studio eq"-stomp to the main output? Please....
^^^fuckin awesome shit
Guitars sounds great!
In a Kemper:
A wah (controlled by additional expression pedal)
B compressor if needed
C vibrato
D noise gate
X octaver
Mod chorus
Delay
Reverb
In a FCB1010:
I use A expression pedal to controll overall volume 40%-100% and B expression pedal to mix delay from 0-80%.
Upper row on FCB are vibrato, octaver, modulation, reverb and tap for delay.
In a Kemper I have locked all effects except compressor and noise gate.
In a FCB I have UNO v.1.0.2.g
Cheers,
-Olli
Im a lucky man cause all my KPA:s leds still work...
-but Im amazed that Kemper doesnt commentate this obviously common problem in any way..
Just would be nice to somehow see what is the name of existing stomp in a slot.
When I have for example stored few different choruses Im not sure which is of these is in the slot because I cant find its name...
So please add this feature.
Ok, thanx for clearing out.
So this should be going to "feature requests"...
Hi there!
How to know which is the name of the stomp when it is in a slot?
I mean, if I have stored it with some name as a preset of my own I cant see that name anywhere when it is in a slot...
Just to be curious...is there some problem to sum stereo signal to mono in DAW? Of course you need one track more....