Better is subjective but larger speaker with more power moves more air making the perception possibly more involving.
Better is subjective but larger speaker with more power moves more air making the perception possibly more involving.
So what you are saying is that Active Full-range loudspeaker like a 15" will have more presence and will be better than Active Nearfield monitor with 10" for example with same Power watts
Or is more like this:
Active Full-range loudspeaker - To play Live
Active Nearfield monitor - To play at home
In terms of definition and quality what will be the better option ? don´t tell me the money 
I understand that 
Nearfield throws the sound in a 'near field', an active FRFR loudspeaker throws farther than nearfield and often has a wider dispersion.
That's my understanding of it.
None of them has necessarily to be better.
Absolutely Ingolf, I have my KPA running through both in the "studio". The nearfields are for work and the FRFR is for fun. There is a place for both really, and you definitely couldn't gig with the nearfilds. 
Nearfields, as Jay Mitchell has cleverly written, are cabs that can't create too much SPL.
My suggestion: once you define the power you need, choose the most linear ones rather than the most powerful ones. If you use them at home (studio) a pair of ultralinear studio monitors are the way to go IMO (even tho I use two CLRs in my studio as well LOL).
Those are fine
