Since there is a request for only "+1" responses in the petition thread, I thought there may as well be a place for anyone for anyone who would like to indicate they don't consider a full blown editor to be a pressing need.
If all they see is a thread full of people who want a full blown editor, it will look like all their customers feel that one is important.
No offense intended to those who would like full editing software, but I like the hardware user interface, other than the current method for naming and tagging the rigs. That appears to be a temporary issue, as it has become easy to infer some kind of rig management software is coming.
Rather than dedicate resources to a full editor in the near future, I would rather they decide they can put emphasis on the previously planned new features for the hardware that had to be put on hold, because of the demand for Performance Mode.
If they make an editor before all those features are installed, it would have to be updated each time a new feature is added, or something is changed.
If they can pack the hardware full of whatever features they have in mind, maybe we will all want an editor at that point 
So, this is not a Petition.
But, hey, you can add a "+1" to this thread, if you don't consider a full blown editor to be important enough to delay other thing
+1
