I want this feature in a second generation Kemper.
In the meantime I enjoy my first generation Kemper immensely.
Life is too short to wait for things to happen in order to be happy with what you got.
Glad to hear this: I want this feature in a second generation Kemper.
I would like to say the same thing about you but I am 50% satisfied and 50% sad lack of this feature. 
Dude, I don't know if this is only a language bareer or what.
You don't need to agree with me at all, and you can have your opinion all you want.
But you should realize the fact that what you demand is not going to happen.
It´s happen or not is another think. Only I just expressed my opinion about KPA. If you ask all users 99% you will say if you want this feature.
I've wondered why I say it. If I want 2 diferents amp right now there is only the option to have 2 Kemper.
If you think it's a big failure you shouldn't have bought the Profiler in the first place.
This doesn't have anything to do with respecting somebody's opinion or not.
And if you don't work for Kemper you can't evaluate at all if an implementation of such a feature is realistic or not.
From all we know after nearly 4 years with the Kemper and its forum, it is not realistic.
And again, you can have a different opinion, but it doesn't change this fact.
If I buy the Kemper or not is my decision not yours. I do not agree to anything you say, nothing.
As a user of Kemper again I say that not having this feature is a big failure for me. Is like having a Ferrari and not being able to go 100km/h …..
I do not pretend to understand it, only that you respect.
Display MoreHere are my thoughts on much of the perceived consumer "need" for the capability of two parallel amp models in digital amps.
By the way, I am not saying this applies to JH-2, who states that he actually uses and relies on this set-up for his regular guitar gigs. That's fine. This is mean't for all the other guitarists who claim they need or want it...but have never actually used 2 x tube-based guitar amps simultaneously (in parallel), at any time in their lives.
I think it stems from the fact that, excluding the KPA, every other digital amp modeler has a more-or-less fixed set of "baked-in" amps. The owner of these devices are limited to a relatively small pool of available amp models. Furthermore, even with updates, the owner's of these devices are limited by, and completely reliant upon the manufacturer's decision and selection in amp models. In other words, they do not have the freedom of choice to "pick and choose" from a huge (and ever growing library) of amp models, and various permutations therein.
To get around this limitation, manufacturer's such as Line 6, Fractal Audio (and others) have implemented the ability of running two parallel amp models, by which the owner can blend the models to achieve new tones. Ever since this feature was first made available...a growing number of guitarists have suddenly determined that that such a feature is necessary and essential. Consequently, it has somehow become an expected "standard" feature that any new top-of-the-line hardware should offer.
As an Kemper owner...Bullocks, I say!! Kemper has freed us from the shackles of limited amp models and the tyranny of the hardware manufacture who gets to pick and choose what amps are made available.
I totally agree with you
OK, I really don't get what it is you want to accomplish here, but why not just make 1 profile which is a sum of 2 amps?
The result is not good.
Display More
I can tell you this, and it is meant to be said with full sympathy: (prevention smiley now)
The Kemper Profiler was never meant to do the 2-amps-at-once-thing in its current carnation, and nobody at Kemper HQ ever hinted at the possibility that it could be implemented by firmware.
That said, if you find this feature 'absolutely neceessary' or 'urgent' like you posted before you should have been aware of this fact before buying, and maybe this would have been a showstopper for you, who knows?
But to me it seems like you didn't make an informed decision before buying, and that is a pity.
OTOH you can have a perfect 2 amps in a room result using 2 Kempers simultaneously.
Don't get me wrong, the forum is of course also for expressing wishes and needs with the Profiler, but I find it often very naive and unrealistic what people think they can expect with a box that does EXACTLY what it's supposed to do.
I don´t agree with you, I don´t think it's unrealistic to implement in one way or another use 2 amps at a time (which is a device of this type).
I respect your opinion but also respect mine, for me that can´t be put 2 amps at same time is a very big failure.
OK, how do you usually use two amps? In which situations? Mic'ed up? Live or studio? For the benefit of yourself (monitoring) or the benefit of the audience?
In all situation, my sound are with two diferents amps.
No, I mean micing up the two amps and summing
I still do not understand who you mean sorry. Now I have only one Kemper and if I want 2 amplifiers need another Kemper, no other way.
If you have your tones dialed in, I would suggest spending some bucks on getting the two-amp combination profiled in a recording studio instead. Much cheaper, I'd hazard
Hi Michael,
You mean do 2 amps profiles simultaneously?
That would not help... I think he once said the hardware of the actual model is not capable of two amps at the same time.
So that would have to be a new model - which probably will become more expensive than... It might solve your space problem, but not that with the money
Size is important
@JH-2 You need a second KPA:)
Yes Paults More money and more space 
Christoph Kemper get busy with this function.
Ingolf I'm not kidding, for me use 2 amps at the same time is absolutely necessary. Kemper people they can add that option in "Kemper 2", if you do not like that option is very easy, you only use one amp
I'm sure if we would have that option would you use 2 amps at same time.
Preset volume should not be turned up too much to prevent internal clipping.
Assuming you drive a cab via monitor output you should turn up monitor volume to satisfactory levels (including the power boost).
Are you German? In this case I recommend reading the reference manual which is acailable in German as a download from the Kemper site.
Thanks Ingolf. Monitor Volumen and Master Volumen have to the maximun, I'll leave the preset volume like this and I will upload the Power Boost Volumen.
I'm not German, are manual in English?
Yes paults of course.
Yes paults,
I tried down the Return Level to the max and results is the same
Which volume you mean, Master Volumen, Monitor Volumen or Preset Volumen? Sorry my English is bad, I don´t understood very good.
Mesa Boogie Rectifier 4x12 cabinet nominal power is 280w.
I totally agree with Tritium, These features are necessary and urgent:
- It will feature faster DSP processor(s) and greater flash memory.
- Significantly improved boot/start-up time.
- Continued evolution of Profiling algorithm and process.
- Ability to merge/blend two different amp models and/or run two different amp models in parallel
- It will also feature STEREO capability for all Outputs, including Monitor Out.
I hope the Namm 2016 gives us the surprise.
Yes, I using DI Box supporting speaker level (I've tried several).
When finished profile have little more distortion and the parameter "Definition" is very low (3.3) and "Power Sagging" (0.0). To make it look a bit more a have to up "Definition" to 7.0 and "Power Sagging" to 6.0. I do not know what is happening 
Hi viabcroce,
Yes, I need more volume. I have a Mesa Boogie 4x12 cabinet (8 Ohm) and have Monitor or Master Volumen to maximun and 1.0 preset volumen.
What is the best, up the preset volume or Power Amp Boost?
