Display More
...
0 = Marshall only
10 = Fender only
...
why not:
3 = Marshall only
7= Fender only
?
(3->0)/(7->10): increases the differences
ao
could work
Display More
...
0 = Marshall only
10 = Fender only
...
why not:
3 = Marshall only
7= Fender only
?
(3->0)/(7->10): increases the differences
ao
could work
The old Digitech modelers were abel to do all this - and it worked very good.
I don't like browse mode - and it's not dynamic
I believe that the difference between the Profiler and a player would be only software, not hardware. Dunno how much cheaper it could be.....
The engine difference between the low power version and high power version of the same car line is also only software
Firmware 1.1.1 allows us to blend a part of the direct sound with the sound created by the amp block.
I would love to have some kind of tone control for it.
Best would be low gain, low frequency, high gain, high frequency (on amp page 3)
Its a nice idea IF the kemper was a modeler.
But this will cause all sorts of phase problems, and transient mismatch.
The Kemper IS a modeler.
The only difference between it and other modelers is, that the parameters can be defined by profiling.
(And that the MODEL seams to be quite great)
and while you're at it, make it stereo
Would be great - but I fear it needs double the current DSP power for the stack block.
Turn the knob slowly = rigs increase/decrease by one
Turn the knob faster = increase/decrease by 10,100
I would love to have a 'profile morphing' feature in one of the next KPA firmware versions.
In general this is a feature to combine the parameters from one profile with the parameters of another profile.
e.g.
a)
I have a great profile of a cranked Marshall amp and a great profile of a clean Fender amp.
I select this two amps for morphing and turn a knob called 'morph'.
0 = Marshall only
10 = Fender only
All between = the PARAMETERS (the 60+ parameters which internally define a profile) will be mixed not the sounds.
If I find a setting to my liking - I store this new profile.
Later I can even morph this profiles with other profiles.
b)
I create 10 profiles of an amp at different level settings. (Level 1,2,3...10)
I select this 10 profiles and select 'auto morph'.
As a result I get ONE profile acting like the real amp.
By this can we CREATE new amps - instead of only profiling existing ones - and can reduce the necessary number of profiles for realistically profiling ONE amp.
What do you think, would it be a good idea, to create a 'read only profiler' - a profiler without the feature to profile itself - only to be able to playback profiles.
I think I would love to have a small 'read only floorboard profiler' incl. controler = some swtiches, tuner and wah pedal. (think like the HD500 or similar products).
very close - great!
sound great!
The 'Am sound' can come because your signal level is to high - in this case simply reduce the input level.
or
because of the KPA artifacts (aliasing) - which happens in case of high pitch notes and high gain sound.
I got this sound on all high gain profiles when playing on the high e string above the 12th fred - I hope this will be fixed in a later firmware.
Maybe the internal oversampling is not high enough for this - or it was reduced to meet the latency spec later.
I would be glad to get rid of this as well - and would accept a little longer latency (maybe this can be switchable) - in case the DSP is at it's limit already.
I am sure there will be a lot more profilers in the future.
For years everybody said "it's not possible to build a device able to listen to a tube amp - and then create the same sound".
Now we know it's possible.
So other companies know "it's possible" they will try to do the same.
On the other side Kemper would be silly not to 'milk' the idea by creating:
- a 19" rack version
- a floor type version
- and later a next gen version
But since the KPA is very new I do not expect anything new this year.
100% agree - I miss the crystals effects from the AxeFx - as well as nice spring reverbs and pitch effects.
Tone AxeFx vs KPA - can't be compared
... You need minutes of refining to get closer to the original sound. With real tube amps you get closer even without refining.
Yes, this was one of the key things I found during my AxeFx profiling - the 20 seconds chord playing did not do the trick - I need minutes of refining - by playing chords, power chords, single notes ... then I got much closer.
Currently profiling:
Some tube stomp boxes with inbuilt speaker simulation.
a) Blackstar HT-Dual
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9j8Gd6TBVw
b) Damage Control Womanizer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRbugTJPc5w
Yes, the Vetta was a great amp in that time - so now you can get my profiles