It surely is around the corner, just a few more sleeps . Who knows... maybe even before summer brake...
Posts by Alienator
-
-
Agree. Everything is mere hopeful speculation, of course. That's why I said autumn. That would be in 2-3 months. I would say that is rather soon for Kemper standards, isn't it? Let's see. It surely is around the corner, just a few more sleeps . Who knows... maybe even before summer brake...
-
What month is that? Autumn is not on my calendar.
I didn't even mention the year.
-
-
Does the HX have the ADT delay? If that’s what I’m having trouble recreating on the Kemper.
Yes, everything that's in the Helix (block and fx wise) is exactly the same in the Stomp, including sound. The main difference is that it only has about 1/4 of the computing power of the Helix.
-
Without having dived deep into this song and its delay settings - what I hear at the beginning is a dotted 8th delay with heavy modulation. I would put the repeat loudness at nearly 100 percent (about 90 to 100?) and the feedback to about 20 to 30 percent. Should be a good starting point?
-
You can buy an HX Stomp for that. I have one in the loop of my Stage and it works fine. But to be honest, I like the Delays and Reverbs of the Kemper in the overall mix better. I use the HX Stomp mainly for boosts and drives (much better imho).
I've had similar work flow complexity issues with the fm9, that's why I sold it. Life with Kemper is easier and now I play more the guitar, again.
-
Ears. During rehearsal.
Even better if you can record the rehearsal and go trough each song part and decide if that is the loudness you need in every part or as a guitarist in your band.
Maybe EQing is another thing. Often being loud does not necessarily mean that your guitars cut through - but maybe that is not what you asked directly.
-
Yep, that stunning finish... I am jealous.
-
Akso Power Stage 170. I'm more than happy.
-
Man. That's it. As always, no glitter but so effective and cool. Wtf, can't wait.
-
I hate to be that guy, buuuut....
No you don't (...read the rest of your comment ).
-
Yep. Besides it is not possible in a technically reasonable way (I claim) that can easily translate to an easy workflow afyerwards - I don't even want thousands of everybody's mediocre tone stacks. Try to pair those with the thousands of different profiles to find the perfect match. Not impossible but almost. Many struggle to find the tonally "best" profiles that already exist. Nah, that's something for the Kemper team like it's Line6's or fractal's job and they also do it pretty perfectly.
-
+1000 But being excited before something is released is not much different.
Yes, it is. He is disappointed for something that is not possible. We are excited because Kemper never disappointed with any new feature.
-
Couldn't agree more with what has been said. The mere prospect of Liquid Profiles levels everything up so much, for me. The new features improve everything so much that I really don't want anything else, now. CK is the man. I can't imagine that just this time will be a disappointment, when every time it was not.
-
-
Hi, welcome to the forum
-
Confusion perfection. Let's talk:
1. In a physical amp with an fx loop, the loop (and therefore whatever FX you put in there) sits between the pre and the power amp. This loop in itself can be serial or parallel, or it can be switchable, blendable or both, depending on the manufacturer and how it is built. So if it is in parallel you often can choose how much of the wet signal you blend in parallel into the dry signal (depending on how that thing is built). If it's a serial loop you won't have the option of blending. In such a rig with a loop you would hear that complete wet signal in your guitar speaker. You can then mic the speaker and send that complete wet signal to the console and FOH. Or you can choose option 2. for an amp without a loop (or with a loop that you don't want to use):
2. A physical amp without a loop (such as older amps): The signal from the speaker is dry (unless you put fx in front of the amp like The Edge does). So you mic the speaker with that dry signal, send it to the console and can then add FX, before the signal goes FOH. These FX can be blended in whatever way, of course: parallel serial etc. In a console you can do whatever you want.
3. In digital units like the Kemper, Helix, Fractal etc. the "amps" don't have a "loop". You place the FX after the (digital) modelled "power amp" and, as I said, most people place them even at the complete end of the chain (at least always after the speaker). In the Kemper you do not have the option to put FX between amp and speaker, while in Helix etc. you can. So that whole digital way is like doing it with an amp without a loop (see 2.). With the Kemper you can choose to put reverb and delay (if you put them into the last two slots, where they are supposed to be) in parallel or blend them in whatever way you want. In more "modern" units like Helix or Fractal you can do much more complex routings. In theory you could put as many fx in parallel as you want (well not really but you get the point). So before the signal goes FOH, for example, you could put 2 delays and 2 reverbs all in parallel (4 paths that don't interfere with each other). With Kemper that's not possible. In the Kemper the X and the 6th slot are always in series and will affect each other. Only the last two slots can be in parallel, if you so choose and therefore don't want the FX in those last two slots to affect each other.
I hope all that makes somehow sense to you, now.
-
Agree with you except for this configuration with Helix. There are preamp/amp(preamp+poweramps)/cabs/combo blocks but not poweramp alone.... So it won't be possible to place a FX between a preamp and a poweramp....But like you said, never seen this configuration....
Yep, you're right. Helix has mere preamp blocks but no power amp blocks...
-
I think he is asking does the post effects function in the same way as a regular effects loop works and I think the answer is yes.
Exactly NOT this (see answers above). The answer already was no. At least if Kemper does not do anything different than the other digital units, internally. Yes, everything has been already answered, I would say, or not?