Here are some of my recent captures from my Mark V. They work pretty well for me both live and recorded.
Mark V Crunch
http://www.kemper-amps.com/api…huvBCBvPow3H0nbCSq7?.kipr
Mark V Extreme
http://www.kemper-amps.com/api…3SBGJnWTThZXy9kxdsj?.kipr
Here are some of my recent captures from my Mark V. They work pretty well for me both live and recorded.
Mark V Crunch
http://www.kemper-amps.com/api…huvBCBvPow3H0nbCSq7?.kipr
Mark V Extreme
http://www.kemper-amps.com/api…3SBGJnWTThZXy9kxdsj?.kipr
Cool, Thanks for sharing The profiles will try them out
You dial in mesas different to a Marshall but that's the profilers job really. Thing with the V IMO is it's a really strong overall mark amp and I do use the soundside profiles but the lead channel isn't as strong as the originals that it tries to be like. Not that I expected it too but when you can easily combine amps in kemper world I'd be looking at the mark IV, IIc+ and even the III for their lead channels. If I had to take a single amp on the road it would be a great choice but we don't have too
Is this one of those amps that's really hard to get a good sound from ?
Not at all. As was said, it's all in how you dial it in, and that is philosophically different than dialing in a Marshall or Fender. Mids and bass are usually kept lower, below 12:00, and treble is your friend to a certain extent. The post EQ is where the real tone shaping happens.
Not at all. As was said, it's all in how you dial it in, and that is philosophically different than dialing in a Marshall or Fender. Mids and bass are usually kept lower, below 12:00, and treble is your friend to a certain extent. The post EQ is where the real tone shaping happens.
Thanks Karl might have to try some of these Mark V profiles and see what all the hype is about this amp
Thank you!
thanks for these profiles, I tried them both,also playing very loud.. really nice sounds..
ps: but I preferred to switch off delay and reverb..