The most secure way is a Peli Case or similar. You will need some padding especially if you intend to check your Kemper in a plane. Check out the way how M Britt does it:
http://www.mbrittprofiles.com/ewExternalFiles/Photo May 20, 7 37 26 PM.jpg
The most secure way is a Peli Case or similar. You will need some padding especially if you intend to check your Kemper in a plane. Check out the way how M Britt does it:
http://www.mbrittprofiles.com/ewExternalFiles/Photo May 20, 7 37 26 PM.jpg
Thank you. Unfortunately, I can test it not earlier than next weekend.
I have SoundLab free samples and SoundLab Mesa Mk4 pack. I also have CiliLab Mesa Dual free samples and the Mr. Dual pack. I think all of these sound very good but with the Mr. Dual I had the issue of imbalance.
With the Soundlab Savage pack, the imbalance is more subtle and might be fine with most people. With the Mr. Dual the character is more prominent. I have compared the DIs with the ones I have made myself and also the ones I have purchased, for example Tonehammer and Origin Audio.
I also have a Soundlab KPA Engl Savage pack which also has somewhat similar character, that the whole profile itself is balanced, but the separate components, in this case the di profile and the cab are not balanced, meaning that the cab is bassy and the di is thin.
I purchased Mr. Double Rector pack from you and I like the tones and the in your face - feeling.
However the DI and the Cab part of the merged profiles are strange: The cab part is quite bassy and the DI part is quite thin, which makes these profiles useless with a guitar cab, in my opinion.
Would you care to make a sound clip of that Jubilee profile?
I think it would be a good idea to have a separate sub-forum for profiling. There users could share their tips for achieving best results with different amps and such.
Ok. Does the commercial pack contain v30s in that cab?
Thanks! Are those Dual Recto profiles merged or studio?
In the Dual Rectos, are the speakers in Stiletto cab really Celestion G12T-75?
Ok, thanks for clarification.
What is your opinion on the subject that to get the most "authentic" profiles, one should use a cabinet profile that is made with the same amp and same settings?
At least I have found that the amp that is being used leaves some of it's characters on the cabinet profile, for example a cabinet profile made with a clean Marshall sounds different than a cab profile of the same cabinet made with overdriven Mesa.
I found just the opposite ...
https://bareknucklepickups.co.…m/index.php?topic=12607.0
I stand corrected. Mismatch seems to be okay for both directions at least temporarily. Here is a interesting blog text on the sonic effects the mismatching causes.
http://blog.hughes-and-kettner…s-speakers-and-impedance/
@Deadlightstudio I have bought some of your profile packs and one of your Mesas from the Oversize pack is perhaps my favourite Recto profile.
I would be interested to know your methods of doing these packs since at least the Jubilee pack and the Splawn pack use the same Mesa Oversize 4 cabinet profile as in the Oversize pack. At least they are named the same and they sound the same to me.
So are you mostly making DI profiles and then combining the with already existing cabinet profiles or are all your profiles done with merging?
Best bet is to find out the true impedance and match it. If that's not possible, then use the 16 ohm output from the Boogie, as it's safer to run a lower impedance speaker than higher (at least that's what I was told about tube/valve amps - opposite for solid state). Any experts who know better, please chime in!
It it is actually the other way around. Here is a good read: https://www.gearslutz.com/board/8137354-post5.html
M1 was also my favourite. How about adding another mic, say a ribbon to get a little more bottom end?
Is the speaker by the way, a G12T-75?
The floorboard version would require better display than the current one.
Which firmware were you using? There was some problem with merged profiles and the cab lock, but I think it has been fixed at least on the betas released this year. https://www.kemper-amps.com/fo…ifferent-Sound/?pageNo=1&
of course there is no advantage when having a lag (in general). the lag is just a fact of life in this case. but i disagree on "terrible, seriously" so far - unless somebody can give me a specific situation where the lag qualifies for "terrible, seriously". "a bit distracting" i can relate to easily.
as for the missing benefit i disagree. a smaller gap (in audio) is an advantage.
It's good to know that it isn't a bug. I was ok with the speed the visuals and audio were changing in version 3.3.0, if you want some reference. But if that 3.30 speed in visuals require bigger gap in audio than in 3.3.0, then I favour the faster audio before the visuals.
I can't see no benefit in visual lag and also find it a bit distracting. I think the visuals should change as immediately as the audio.
Or can someone explain to me what are the advantages of the lag?
I agree that the Stomp Menu -browsing should start with the current effect type.
same here
Some people prefer studio profiles, some merged, to me the best is if the vendor offers both.