glad you picking up the slack for me.
keep em coming
Trying to get 1 or 2 per week for a while. Lots of different stuff. 
Trying to get some tunes out there.
Hi Tom, I'm honestly a bit surprised at the lack of responses too..I was starting to wonder what that could be..Well, thanks for your response, that's very nice to hear!!!
I have nice things coming such as a Friedman JJ and Smallbox, Marshalls jmp50 plexi ('67), superlead plexi ('68) and superbass plexi ('69), Fenders showman ('62) and bassman silverface and more....
As for the numbering, I get what you're saying. I always work from the local library before moving a selection to the profiler. At least this way you get them neatly in order in your local library.
If I only start with BM, they will appear randomly between all the other BM profiles in the browse mode...But I promise I will continue to experiment with this to find the best solution. In any case, this is valuable criticism!!!
Looking forward to the old Marshall and Fender packs!
It makes sense especially since the main gain can go beyond the amp gain. So it actually gives you a wider range to control.
I'm a previous customer of the MattFig profiles. Like some of those for sure...pre LP treatment.
Bought the '71 Modded Super Lead LP pack. Is it just me or are the bass frequencies WAY too heavy? In comparison, I had a 76 Super Lead per Reampzone that I gave the post LP treatment too and the bass is controllable within the amp EQ...as it should be.
I'm hesitant to try others if they're all the same i.e. too bass heavy. I'd need to use post EQ shaping to get the low end mud out on the '71 LP pack. Maybe that's a feature of the Friedman mod, but it's not really worth trying to make it work by tying up a slot to EQ out the low end.
For clarity, this is on the DI profiles both using an Ownhammer IR and the Kemper Kab with Greenback imprint. Bass is too present in both scenarios.
I purchased the SL pack and haven’t noticed any bass heaviness to them. I’m only using the studio profiles and not the DIs.
https://mattfig.bigcartel.com/…quid-71-sl-fried-profiles
Magic not found in BE100 is found here!!! Demos in link!
Digging this pack.
Thank you 👍👍
Digging the 1960 cab versions of these profiles. Well done!
Morphing should work at Liquid Profiles, if you avoid Amp Model Gain, but set up Morphing for Generic Gain instead, This has the same practical effect, since both gains are linked. You need to enter amp settings and set up Morphing for Generic Gain on page 4. You can do this at the hardware or in Rig Manager. Amp Model Gain will follow the Morphing of Generic Gain correctly. It gets also stored correctly.
At Liquid Profiles the dedicated knob at the front panel controls Amp Model Gain. For the time being, don't use this knob to set up Morphing. It cannot work correctly.
Thank you using the generic gain worked perfectly and makes sense since it's linked directly to the 'normal' gain control.
thanks again
i'm having the same issue with saving morph on the gain settings with liquid profiles only. Can't get the morph changes to save and stick either on the KPA itself or through rig manager. Have tried clearing morph settings, only way to correct it is to remove the liquid profile and go back to kemper generic, then saving morph changes for gain. It sticks once i go back to kemper generic gain/eq tone stack.
Display MoreQuestions please:
I do not see Bright Cap intensity, Gain Pot Reference, Restore Gain, Restore Amp Model, Restore EQ or Burn in the Rig manager Amp module.
I assume once a Liquid Amp model is selected, you then use Gain, not Generic Gain, even though Generic Gain is what goes from grey to lit/active. That is a bit counterintuitive. Then the addendum says:
While the regular Gain control is narrowed down to the authentic gain range of the selected Amp Model, the Generic Gain control in the menu still represents the wide Gain control of the PROFILER. When you move any of the two Gain controls, you will observe that both are linked – they will move simultaneously, but at different speeds and values. With the Generic Gain control, however, you can choose to exceed the maximum limit of the model Gain control. When “Kemper Generic” model is selected, then the regular Gain control and the Generic Gain show the same value.
This does not happen for me in Rig Manager.
these controls like bright cap are on the kemper itself in the amplifier block but don’t show up in rig manager. Maybe that will change over time and with updates.
compressor in the input section to free up a stomp slot
I think I read in the comments or in another thread he does it this way because he’s printing the effects as well. So the first pass gets printed with effects. The he deletes and re-records one track and is printing that new track with one side of the effects. So the slight variations in his playing will also include the effects that line up with the variations and not the effects from the original recording. I haven’t tried it to see if it makes a noticeable difference. Interesting idea to try.
interesting way to double track from Bert.
Michael, loving the new pack especially the SL68.
one question, I notice on these new profiles that my P90 equipped guitars are really quiet even on higher gain settings. Are you doing something different in your profiling process that would account for this? I would love to get the same level of noise on my older profiles. Just curious.
Thanks
Sean
does it tune ok in positions 2 or 4? Assuming you have a 5 way switch, or can select more than one single coil at a time. That stabilizes it for me when tuning.
If things sound good from the headphone output, then see if you can get an aux feed from the board without your guitar. Send that signal to the aux in on the kemper and blend it in to taste. That’s how I use IEMs.
that mic stand/automation/robotics piece is pretty slick, thanks for sharing
I picked it up and some of the cleaner tones are nice. Not crazy about the overdrive and distorted tones. YMMV
I don’t think anything in this pack will replace my current go-to profiles.
