Could you please be more specific, are they in a map pack? I don't see any folder referring to the Players Factory Rigs.
didn't see the Player tag, sorry, my bad
Could you please be more specific, are they in a map pack? I don't see any folder referring to the Players Factory Rigs.
didn't see the Player tag, sorry, my bad
From Rig Manager go to Kemper Factory Content, all there
all the factory Rigs a available in Rig Manager
In Ear ist der einzige Weg, der Abend für Abend konsistente Ergebnisse bringt.
Der grundsätzliche Mix muss einmal gemacht werden und dann müssen die benutzen Sounds eingepegelt werden.
Meistens kann man per Tablet den Mix sogar auf der Bühne anpassen (also Gitarre 1-2dB hochziehen oder so)
Ich mache das jetzt seit zwei Jahren so mit einer gut gebuchten Band und ich hatte nie einen so guten Sound -> das gibt Sicherheit und das hört man auch
Man hat einen sauberen, individuellen Stereo Mix, und zwar egal wo man sich auf der Bühne befindet - bei wedges etc. ändert ja alleine schon ein leichtes Drehen des Kopfes den Sound...
wer partout keine In-Ear Monitore benutzen will, bekommt mit dem Kabinet eine leichte Lösung (habe ich vorher lange benutzt) die über einen wesentlich größeren Sweetspot verfügt als ein herkömmlicher Monitor/Cabinet
I have always been fine with amp snapshots, using the stock Kemper EQ and gain to tweek. I really don't have much need /*/for amplifier liquid profiling. Yes it's cool, but not needed.
What I think would be better implemented is Liquid FX profiling of popular and vintage modulation FX. Example: M117 Fanger, Electric Mistress, ADA flanger, Phase 45/90/100, Boss chorus CE1, CE2.
Liquid Profiles made the transition from the standard snapshot taken during the profiling process to authentic gain, tonestack, bright cap behaviour by implementing user selectable models in the AMPLIFIER section.
The fx already are models.
What you are asking for (I believe) is to have more specific models that closely mimic the behaviour of classic stomps, instead of the more 'open' models that rely on parameters to get there.
No matter where you come down in this open model vs. specific model argument, it really has nothing to do with 'Liquid', since they all are already models as previously stated. Which is the only point I was trying to make, sorry for the long post
Yeah, I tried that once - my hands didn't like it
um, the WD40 is only there for the sanding process, afterwards it should of course be cleaned thoroughly
You can even get far with the rough edge of a kitchen sponge
and a little bit of WD40 IME
I have a Italia Maranello Speedster with a wonderful Blue Sparkle finish - also on the back of the neck.
Since it is part of the overall color scheme, removal of that finish wasn't an option, but I didn't really care about how it felt.
I used on it what I use on all my guitar's necks from time to time: 0000 (4!) steel wool.
It is so fine that it doesn't really remove any material it is really just a surface conditioner, all that comes off is very fine dust (wear a mask),
and it makes necks feel like super clean, polished glass. Very smooth without any stickyness.
It's just dormant.
as it should be
it's a place for unruly threads that serve no purpose - a measure of last resort really - IIRC we only had to use it once.
I have some experience with guitar to MIDI (Axon AX-100 mkII and Graphtech saddles with the MIDI board to 13-pin) and with Jam Origin.
I'm not using it since it doesn't work reliably for me.
What does work, is a monophonic solution. I use the Sonuus G2M together with a monophonic synth - DSI Mopho for example.
guitar -> PROFILER -> Direct Output (DI Signal) to Sonuus G2M -> MIDI to DSI Mopho -> Effect loop return post STACK which let's me blend the distorted guitar signal with the synth signal and put both through up to three effects. Sounds massive.
Yeah. The "use your ear" argument is equally valid/invalid for most other parameters. Gain, phaser manual, chorus depth. You name it.
how can it be invalid?
the 'secret' to good tone, mixing or even sound design has always been to really listen first.
I would be so damn happy to have my beloved marshall bluesbreaker pedal tone into my kemper! Nevertheless , the effects the kemper profiler offers work pretty well with whatever you need, i cant complain, but it would be damn perfect if you could just add this feature that allows you to add a specific profile for a pedal you really love, and add it to your preferred amp. I mean, if it is possible to profile an amp’s tone and overall sound, i think it should be possible to create a way to profile a pedal’s tone and use it with your profiler. Kemper, please let us know if this becomes something real in the future .
Meanwhile ill just keep adding it to the signal chain and continue to enjoy it as i have done all these years, and tweaking it by hand between songs…
I don't see this going anywhere or even being a worthwhile discussion to be honest - closed.
So, uh, it seems like I'm a cautionary tale. All of my Kemper Player woes are my fault. I go from the Kemper into a looper and thereafter out to monitors. I simply didn't notice that my level out of the Kemper Player was just way, way too damn high. I have some great working profiles.
nice trouble-shooting
If there were active pickups involved, it could very well be a dying battery.
the parameter 'Cut' on the right indicates, that this PROFILE uses a 'Voice Ace' Amp Model which has a Bass, Treble, Cut layout.
when and how does the 'Middle' pop up?
that is pretty much what the Echo Machine does - try the 'Cut More' feature on an off as well
I had one for a short while many years ago and found it quite unremarkable, which is why I sold it, even without getting a frequency plot or impulse response from it.
The Echomachine preset is probably not that far off.
Do you have a Carbon Copy?
it's in: Category -> 'Chorus'
Certainly. The important thing is that "that specific cabinet" is present in the chain, even during the creation of the direct profile.
that is, how a Direct Amp Profile is made
you are looking for Merged Profiles