Hi.
I have just uploaded some Entombed inspired profiles to RE.
You can also download them here 
The profiles are meant to be used together ( quad tracked ).
HM-2 profile : Solar 7 string, HM-2w, Laney GH100l, Mesa Boogie OS, SM57
DS-1 profile : Solar 7 string, DS-1, Laney GH100l, Mesa Boogie OS, SM57
A few years back I was considering a DynaMount as well. It's an incredibly cool concept and as soon as you see it you wonder why it hasn't been around all along. Especially if, like me, you're often the only person in the studio serving both as engineer and (alleged) talent.
Ultimately, instead of buying one I just sold all my amps and bought a Kemper.
Is that cheating?
I went the other way. After buying the Kemper I have been buying more amps and cabs ??
I have a Dynamount and love it. It’s so convenient.
Such a great upgrade to the studio. Very convenient indeed ??
I added some profiles of my Trem-O-Verb. Feel free to check them out 
Display MoreOooooo Man!!! I can’t wait to hear these!
Big fan of the 5150 of yours!
already loaded them up...GGGRRRREAT Fricken bite on #26 and the Off Ax 31!!
Thanks so much man!
Glad you like them.
I did some test profiles with my new DynaMount.
This thing is so good!
Please be aware that the JDI engagaes a bandpass filter to emulate a 12" Speaker when activating the Speaker -30dB PAD.
This is not supporting the concept of a Direct Amp Profile, as it introduces a speaker emulation.
I was just about to say
Thank You
These are wonderful, thank you!
Thanks, looking forward to checking these out!
Thanks so much for sharing all of these great amps! Much appreciated.
You are welcome.
Thanx dude \m/
If it's a mono signal distributed across the KPA's stereo outs, the two halves will be phase-coherent.
If you sum them in a DAW, there'll be an increase in level, but that's about it, so in such cases one might as well record only one of the stereo-out halves (L or R).
This is true. But if you have any type of stereo effect on, like rev or mod, it would be a different story.
I recorded something in stereo and it’s partially phasey. If I sum then to Mono will they not be phasey?
If you have recorded in stereo, and for some reason you don't want to re-record, you could split the stereo file in two mono files and delete one of them.
Mono is king \m/
That's interesting to hear. While modern country (at least here in the US) is basically just pop sung with a southern twang and thus the wall of sound thing, blues is something I would have expected to be more of a sparse arrangement. As I think more about this, it seems that the benefits of single versus multiple tracked guitars has less to do with genre and more with the sparseness or fullness of the overall arrangement. Especially since, to paraphrase Yoda, "Always in motion is the music."
Of course, I have no exposure to the music scene in Norway so I don't know what the vibe is like there for things like country and blues.
Arrangement is key when it comes to recording music.
Here is a example of Norwegian country/blues. This is an old recording of a band I used to play in, and this was recorded like i described earlier.
Only differanse is that the left and right guitar was recorded with different amps this time.
This was recorded at our rehearsal space, so the sound quality is not the best 
And here is a band I produced earlier this year. Guitars are double tracked using the same amp for left and right. And on the choruses I think we ended up with 8 or 10 tracks of guitars panned 100% LR.
Display MoreI've been wondering about this lately myself.
To me, conceptually, it seems like wide guitars are the enemy of a good mono folddown.
My thinking:
Wide guitars necessitate a lot of difference between the two tracks - since stereo width is basically an effect of the differences between the signal in each channel of the stereo mix.
But when thinking in terms of "mid/side", all that differences is is actually sounds that are out of phase with each other. Which means more cancellation when folding down to mono.
Thinking of it this way exclusively, I would actually think that in order to achieve good mono compatibility, you should actually use the SAME amp, settings, guitar etc etc on both tracks - and not go for having different sounds left and right.
Four separate takes. Two with the main rhythm sound (same amp and settings panned LR) and two with a different/lower gain sound (same sound and same settings panned LR). This is easy.
I have never had any problems with this. I record/produce rock, blues, country, metal and stoner rock.
When I record guitars I do it the same way almost every time. Double tracking for the majority of the song (two separate takes) and quad tracking (four separate takes. Two with the main sound and two with a different/lower gain sound) for the parts that need it, like chorus and bridge etc.
All tracks panned 100% left and right.
Old video, but informative.
There are some really great profiles in here. I am really liking the Marshall packs, but particularly loving the Fender amps at the moment for the jangly stuff. Many, many thanks for these! Some great effects settings too, to top it off. I like others, hope that you aren't giving up on the profiling.
Thanx. I have two Kempers now, so I'm not quitting any time soon
Wow, some of the clean profiles are spectacular. Thanks!!!!
Thank you.
Thanks a lot. Sounds great.
Very Nice thanks a bunch!!!!
You're welcome.
WOW- Thanks a lot. I always loved your MarkVs...please keep profiling, you´re doing an absolutely awesome job!
Thank you and you do fantastic work!
Thank You! I've always held Your profiles among the best I have found on RE... Great work!
Thanx guys
