Posts by Nikos

Quote from Amcolan

I saw that video. That’s how I learned the phase trick and where to place the mics. He doesn’t really go into much detail on how he chooses to blend the two with the faders.

Oops..sorry my friend..

I did not not watch the vid,I just remembered that it exists and posted it.

In any case..

It is all "down to taste" I guess. There is no general rule how to mix two mics. I am sorry. It is all about this silly "when it sounds good it is good " kind of thing. It all depends on what you want to achieve and the gear you have.

Quote from Morph

I held back on the beta because of gigs but I cheekily upgraded yesterday and I swear that the feel through my in ears was better, even with no other tweakage. Psychosomatic possibly but I had a really enjoyable gig.

Everything in music is "psychosomatic". I needed decades to understand this 100% for me.

Anyway..

Actually LP leads us out of the rabbit hole again. And after 20 years of tweaking parameters..this is a huge thing.

For "tweakers" not so much. Ofcourse.

There are definitely some circuits which "fight back" any attempt for "easy shred".

And others which will support it.

I have been following this thread now for some weeks.

My personal opinion on the "I feel I can play faster now"-kind of discussion is the same now for the last 40 years:

Grab a classical guitar (nylons) and practice patterns with a thick,fat pick. In my experience there is no better way to train the fingers..

Quote from HamerJo

when I was much younger than today we enjoyed jokes about playing the guitar. One was the good advice to add a little "fast fret" lotion before trying again the tricky part.

The fast fret lotion!!!

The best part about it was the face of the guy in the shop.."yeah with this you can play like eddie.."

When you're 13-14 you believe in this kind of stuff..'nature of things I guess..

Quote from lbieber

Funny how we all have different experiences and viewpoints. I bought a Mesa Mark iii 60/100 (head and 4x12) in 1985 which I still own.

That amp can be punishingly loud in a way that I never experienced with any Marshall or any other amp for that matter. It made every Marshall sound like crickets on a cool night. Not saying louder is better, just stating the fact.

The Mark iii in rhythm 2 could be tweaked to sound almost exactly like a 1959, for better or worse. The 1959 was never my cup of tea, but it is a data point for tone.

The MARKIII is the John Sykes Sound 9n the 1987 album. .. some people even claim it is "very marshally "..

I don't know I played this amp only once or twice not very loud in a music shop.

Quote from V8guitar

I think the example given was more about scoping mids than volume because that was the trend with the graphic as Metallica always quoted it...

Yes ofcourse!

Quote from alerich

The 2205/2210 amps weren't horrible. You just had to keep them away from a 2203/2204. I gigged in a band with a guy who played a 2205 (2210 - not sure). I thought his tone sounded good. In his next band he played with a guy who had an early 80s 2204. The difference in tone was unmistakable. Life is sometimes a matter of perspective.

oh yes..

The same funny thing happened with many mesa guys and their caliber 50/studio preamp rack with the graphic EQ (always "V-tweak") in these two-guitar-players bands...

Mesa guy:"Hey guys listen..this is the metallica-sound.."

Marshall guy: graaaaang....

Mesa guy: "I can't hear me,I can't hear me..."

It was always the same. Hehe...

Quote from stratdude

My brother had a 2204, sounded great cranked until the cops came, but we both thought it was dumb, no gain until you crank it.

I ended up getting a 2210, the shop had three of them that I was switching between, 2 sounded like ****, just fuzzy gain. But one sounded not fuzzy at all, and I still own it 28 years later. Sounds glorious with my Monte Allums modded SD-1, I've yet to find a profile that sounds as good.

Only recently I discovered the pre '87 units were the less desirable units (I assume the 2 fuzzy ones I tried), that seem to give the 2210/05s a bad reputation.

My brother swapped his 2204 for a Peavey Triumph 60. Possibly the dumbest trade ever

Display More

I actually knew a guy who had a very convincing sounding 2205 back in the day. But in general there was a 2204/modifying hype specially after the this hype spilled over from the USA and a very famous (back then) german guitar player went on tour with a Baldringer modified 2204. Which sounded fantastic. REALLY fantastic.

The issue with all these mods..they broke down a lot. Preferably during the gig. The reason I never modified my beloved 2204..I went one day to the shop to this amp guy with the amp and the money in my hands ..and there were like 6-7 plexis & 2204 standing and waiting for "repair" while an angry player just left the shop saying in an angry tone that "this is the second time" and that he would "need his amp on stage and not in the repair all the time".

Anyway..

Until the Rectifier and the 5150 appeared the "hunt for the grail tone" was a mess. Broken Marshall's,silly racks and expensive Mesa mk amps.. and ofcourse the epic '80s "fx-loop misery".. haha..

And then people ask why whoever went though all that ..loves his Kemper today..

Quote from GearJocke

Dalls Rangemaster was used by many well known guitarists. Didn't many guitarists used rack effects with built in OD's in the 80's?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…angemaster_Treble_Booster

For sure..and many other treble boosters,some even custom made (eddie kramer for jimiand others) but this is not my point.

My point is that there was never a "nerdy pedal hype"..This came in the late '90s and became "transcendental" and somewhat ZEN in the following decade.

Quote from lbieber

The MXR+ was not a treble booster. For me the trick was to use an almost dead 9V battery. It was maybe the best drive pedal ever in that configuration.

The DA treble booster was a great unit as well. Plugged right into the guitar. Did way more than the name indicates.

We have a slighty different perespective. Maybe due to location? I appreciate your viewpoint.

All good. I fully agree with you. I just don't remember anyone back then in the 80s who was into any kind of pedal hype. That's all..

Quote from Wheresthedug

I know. Unfortunately rehearsal studios were full of them though. Probably because it made wannabe rockstars feel like the real thing so brought in business.

Oh yes.. whatever played the "big names"..

Quote from lbieber

I had a Dan Armstrong treble booster, a big muff, an MXR distortion +, and Fuzz face myself. I bought the treble booster in 75 and all others came after that.

From memory Maestro fuzz, Fuzzrite, Tonebender, Rangemaster, Boss offered a few I think.

Along the way 80s and beyond I owned many others

Absolutely..fuzz..

Treble boosters..that mxr..wasn't that a treble booster too?

All the drives and distortion pedals came later in the 80s. I wouldn't say that people loved them. As they did not love the od-channel of the 2205/2210.

Otherwise there would have not been this hysteria with the marshall mods of the 2204 back then.

Anyway..

Quote from Wheresthedug

I was only having a laugh. I know there is way more to it than just single tube or diodes.

I remember using 100w JCM800s in rehearsal rooms back in the day and absolutely hating them. It turned out that the reason (at least in my case) was that I just never got them running hard enough for the power amps to really saturate and do their thing. With those amps, a large part of the magic was in the output section.

I still have a Rev G Rectifier that was my main amp from around 1996 until I got the Kemper and I love it but that amp and Soldanos etc rely on the pre-amp for the tone with a clean high headroom power amp to make it loud.

Two very different approaches but both wonderful when done well.

It is true however that a large number of very successful amps did, and still do, use diodes in the clipping section. Almost every Marshall since the JCM800, the JMP1 preamp, Blackstar etc and I believe even the Dumble FET mode is a solid state clipping circuit. Most people don't even know that these "all valve" amps that they love are actually getting their distortion from a build in overdrive pedal.

Display More

Even back then ..100w were "to much".

Most players I knew were hunting for 2204. I had (actually still have) a 1981 2204..

Had some "obscenely good offers" but kept it because I wanted it to modify and use it myself. It is still in original condition and I see now offers again in the 3000-4000€ on eBay.. hmm..

Quote from lbieber

I guess it depends on how you define the 'golden era'. Pedals were being used in the 60s and 70s A LOT. And I don't remember them being the enemy no1. Didn't happen IME. It seems you and I are from different generations with different memories or viewpoints. All good...

How many pedals do you know from the 60s and 70s?

I mean OD and Dist-pedals?

And in the '80s which pedal was the "choice of the guitar heroes"???

Don't like to argue with you. Just curious.

Quote from lbieber

There were lot's of 'traditional' amps modded with cascaded gain staging, diode clippers(silicon, germanium, LEDs), different types of master volume, PAB, biasing, etc... Most were looking for more, like goes to '11'. Also, music was changing and super high gain became a thing guitarists desired.

Boutique became a thing, but mods came first simply because so many amps already existed and it is easier to mod an existing amp rather than build a full amp from scratch.

Judging by the effect pedal market, it seems not that many ditched pedals for very long if at all. Guitarists seem to be on an endless, outward search for some 'magic'. IME, most never look inside of themselves.

Things developed rapidly in the '80. Ultra Fast. Mods,racks,"boutique"..Ofcourse for us europeans..whatever came from the USA..we copied it.

But pedals were never part of the hype in the "golden era". Not at all. Rather the "enemy no1".

I remember vividly when I noticed this "pedal-revival" at the beginning of the 2000s and young lads asked "what OD used Eddie on eruption" or Ingwie on far beyond the sun..

That was an interesting time.

The answer is ofcourse that all the tube amp technicians put an extra preamp tube (12ax7 I believe I don't remember anymore ) into the circuit. People wanted "tube gain" and were obsessed by it.

Btw we talk only about the single channel JCM800s.. 2204/50w..

Quote from Wheresthedug

Except most Marshalls and many other "tube amp" legends use Solid State Clipping Diodes in the pre-amps anyway. I'm not an amp tech but from what I hear the JCM 800 is pretty much a distortion pedal with a valve power section I think

So what went wrong and thousands and thousands of guitar players all over the world ditched their pedals and either went for "modifications" of their 800s or bought SLOs/5150s or Rectifiers??

Quote from V8guitar

My lesson on drives....stomps are not needed, find the right amp (and therefore) profile and they are not needed...but that's just me.

In the "old" days, drives were often needed because of the lack of a master volume or just not enough gain in an amp. Most people used cheap boss type solid state pedals, so I never understood why someone would have a glorious valve amp with a cheap ss pedal in front. However people got more creative in balancing their drives with the amp or just became used to a certain sound and hence drives became part of their sound. Pedals got more expensive and sophisticated as well and sometimes cost more than the amp!

Now its a whole cottage industry full of myths as well as magic...the TS has become the go to drive, used by so many famous people, but I've never liked them. The Klon has reached "legend" status amongst pedal nuts, commanding stupid money. I have even seen the increase in price of the old Marshall Gov'nor pedals which IMO they were awful.

The point is, its so subjective that there is no right or wrong answer, but I do think much of it is psychological and law of diminishing returns - Nuno recently said he has a ProCo Rat plugged in but with no drive engaged which just adds something...but few people who try his rig can hear the difference..

Personally, start with decent amps and see if anything is missing. I recently added the Klon 4 from the presets in the KPA on a couple of profiles, but I really can't hear much difference, just another tone shaper/add's slight compression etc...

Display More

The whole SLO-/5150-/Rectifier-/Bogner etc hype grew out of the hate and the desperation for the boss and ibanez OD/DIST-pedals..

I don't remember a single '80 shredder who did not ran with his jcm800 to a local tube amp guru for "some modification "..

This is ofcourse something that nobody wants to hear about today.