Remote performance change buttons
-
-
Display More
This subforum is called "feature request."
It's mainly a platform where we can transport wishes and requests to the Kemper staff.
The normal way of user reaction is to like, to ignore it or to comment the request.I have not the feeling that you have the intention to help. Even you do not treat the request itself.
You hitchhiked the thread with unasked advices in case that the request will not realised.You can be sure that I and the most here can work with the Kemper, when a request will not implemented.
If I have a problem I will ask in another subforum and competent hints or advises will be welcomed.
Back to topic.
The performance numbers will always changed in the same (for me wrong) direction with these buttons.
It makes no sense to change the order of performance titel.The only advantage or your postings are, that the thread comes back on the top of requests again and can be seen for longer time on the first page.
Maybe for this this I should be thankful.I think the gist of my suggestion is getting lost in translation, i.e. you're mistaking my intent at making the suggestion as some way of deterring you from making the request. The request has already been made and I have never said anything other than "I don't think they'll do it", but what do I know?
As far as I'm concerned, I've done nothing to "hitchhike" the thread and my posts have been on topic as far as the feature request is concerned, since I am suggesting a workaround for you to have the performances increase in ascending order.
If you want a "yes man" or "plus one" man, you're in the wrong forum. I reiterate, I haven't denied your right to a feature request.
And look, your post has been bumped to the top of the Feature Request section again. Maybe Kemper Amps will take note now.
-
And look, your post has been bumped to the top of the Feature Request section again. Maybe Kemper Amps will take note now.
You are right its on the top again.
Let's bury the hatchet - I overreacted! -
Sharry Sorry my friend, I meant Rome was not built in a day... Things like this might take time to change, especially if others don't have the same opinion or don't think that there's a problem.
Yes I am disappointed that the request is not perceived as important.
But it was my fault that the topic moved to the background by making the climate unconfortable. -
You are right its on the top again.
Let's bury the hatchet - I overreacted!All good!
I really think the Remote and Kemper could do with some performance improvements, one of the reasons I haven't moved on from my midi board. I can activate five stomps simultaneously with a single button press, something that I miss with the Remote's workflow.
But the Remote has a single cable and easier access to the looper, besides easy programming, so I'm still considering a purchase when I have the money.
Probably be as miffed as you about the buttons being "the wrong way" too, haha
-
I can activate five stomps simultaneously with a single button press, something that I miss with the Remote's workflow.
You can do that with the remote and I suppose it's much easier than with a MIDI pedal. Or are you talking about external stomps?
Sorry for being off topic
-
You can do that with the remote and I suppose it's much easier than with a MIDI pedal
With the remote you can asign only 2 stomps to one button (not 5).
-
With the remote you can asign only 2 stomps to one button (not 5).
@Sharry my friend this is not correct.
Only the first two stomps colours are shown, but you are not limited to 2 stomps per button (siehe Seite 17 §1 Kurze Anleitung: "Auch wenn einem Effekt-Taster in einem Rig drei oder mehr Schaltfunktionen zugewiesen sein sollten, werden durch die LEDs nur die Zustände der ersten beiden Schaltfunktionen signalisiert") ... -
You are correct!
You can assign more. But only two are visible.@Sharry It shows that the Kemper has hidden depths... but also that all is fathomable... 'scuse the pun my friend...
-
No it shows that I do not use so much effects. With 4 Button I have enough.
I forgot the fact! -
Not sure about the German quotation, but you can assign 4 fx to each button regardless their status, which is a great plus IMO
-
Not sure about the German quotation, but you can assign 4 fx to each button regardless their status, which is a great plus IMO
In the german quotation is written "even you can assign 3 ore more switch functions only the status of the first two switch functions will be signalized."
The limitation to 4 seemed to be written at another place.As I mentioned before - for me more than enough
-
Ah, thanks
PS: Weird way to write "4": "three or more"?
LOL
-
Well I'm with you Sharry. I find the current setup backwards as well. and wish we at least had a choice of how the buttons work.
And I'm not fond of the Remote layout either -
And I'm not fond of the Remote layout either
Well it is first version. I think we can expect improvements.
I have sometimes Problems with the Looper Button.
For live performance the looper is almost not usable for me, but pressing the button by chance can produce problems during the Gig.Same can happen with tuner button, but here you can avoid it by soft button.
The signalisation with colours what type a stomp is assigned to is great, I love it very much.
