Posts by DonPetersen


    I have to agree on that, I know at least 3 people, other than me, that are trying to figure out something good with the actual Muff implementation of the KPA, with no good result.
    Just as example, searching for a "good" sound for "In The Flesh" song, after many trials, I ended up using a profile of Andy44 with already a profiled stomp in it (the 2some)...
    I believe that an addition/correction in this area can really make happy a lot of people here. So, let's hope you will take this in consideration... :rolleyes:


    not my quote, it's from Garrincha

    sweet profile!
    I love how the attacks 'pop'.


    this will be on the Twitter Rig Watch soon!


    adding the Plus DS with Drive 2.1 and Volume +0.8 adds nice extra OD with body.

    Wow! That worked great Don!


    I'm glad to hear it! :)


    I will try the spdif later. I just got lost on what to set the kemper to in its settings.


    in the output menu (click the 'Output' button), on page 1, just make sure that the SPDIF output is set to 'Master Stereo'


    then set your soundcard to 44.1kHz sampling rate and sync to SPDIF


    that's it.

    welcome! :)


    a quick way to get modern clean tones is to simply turn the gain all the way down from a metal rhythm rig.
    the same principles apply: nice bass, brilliant top end and scooped mids.
    the definition parameter can also help to make the cleans shine (settings in the 5-10 range), and the Amp slot's compressor (not the stomp) can smooth them out a bit, if needed.


    have fun!


    @ Don: are you maybe referring to the Top Boost circuit? If this is the case, it was actually an active tonestack as opposed to the Vox classical HiCut control.


    no, I don't think so.
    someone on a fuzz website posted a schematic of that circuit and build a clone for himself.
    I'll try to find it again... ;)



    p180: Vox created a new model 7120, 120-watt (the bass amp was 4120) using solid-state pre-amp with a valve output section, the Beatles receiving the first models made.
    Says it had a transistor vibrato unit and VOX worked up a fuzz for them built into the amp.


    ah, I missed that. great info, thanks!


    now, who has a working 7120??? :D

    here's a simple test:


    use only a patch cable from send to return.
    I just did and there is no difference between the loop on and off.


    how 'exactly' did you connect and set the reverb?

    I made FX rigs for Rig Pack 04 for this exact purpose


    from the pdf:


    FX Alien Bender
    A great source of deep, spacey drones. Low, sustained
    single notes turn into a big, vibrating cloud of sound that
    gets smoother over time. Chords start out dissonant, almost
    distorted, and evolve into ambient washes. The Frequency Shifter
    together with pre and post amp compression are the main
    ingredients here. Depending on your guitar and pickups, this
    rig might create quite a bit of low frequency content, so carefully
    check how the volume setting works for you and adjust if necessary.


    FX Bad Cellphone
    A compressed, bit-crushed signal is fed into a dirty amp
    and heavily filtered. In fact, the Graphic EQ removes 12dBs
    from all bands while boosting 1250Hz by 9.5dBs. It sounds
    kinda like miking an amplifier with a cell phone with poor
    reception. Note how the sustain gets grainier and finally
    chokes. Useful for Intros, layering and break down parts.


    FX BAR Fuzz Fays Lead
    A profile of the mighty Barnacle Fuzz, set to sound like a
    Fuzz Face on steroids. The post-amp stereo widener,
    compression and delay are all set to 'duck' out of the way
    of your playing, but to get bigger when you sustain a note
    or pause. Also great with the tone knob on your guitar turned
    all the way down.


    FX Circuit Bent Amplotron
    If the Mars rover Curiosity would find an amplifier
    build by an ancient civilization on the red planet, I bet
    it would sound something like this. Soft Shaper, Bit
    Shaper and Rate Reducer age your signal by
    approximately 15,000 years and the touch wah postamp
    gives it an alien vocal quality.


    FX GT-1000 Nightmare
    Rate reduction and a ring modulator turn a 9V practice
    amp into the stuff that haunts you at night. Chords are
    edgy and grainy with a pumping compression, while
    higher single notes create tension with their metallic,
    insectoid shadows.


    FX GT-1000 Wah Lead
    This fuzzy rig has a nice artificial quality to it that is
    further enhanced by the Wah Phaser and has
    surprisingly good definition and attack. Again, useful
    for Intros, layering and break down parts.


    FX Martian Dub Step
    A low-pass filtered tremolo hits a distorting amp and
    the result is rectified for good measure. The infamous
    Dub Step 'Wobble' for your guitar. Try it with low
    power chords in drop D.


    FX Multi AM Clean
    One tremolo and two ring modulators create a dense,
    bubbly, almost 3D-ish amplitude modulation.
    Arpeggiate suspended and add9 voicings with open
    strings for swirly, psychedelic goodness.


    FX Pick Harmonics Lead
    The wah and mid-boost before the stack and the lowand
    high-pass filters post stack give you a thick and
    solid lead tone. When you really dig in, you can 'duck'
    the delay and reverb enough to give you a crunchy
    rhythm sound or make your singly note runs sound
    loud and clear. Then, if you play an artificial/pick
    harmonic, bend it and hold it - the delay and reverb
    will come in and enlarge this one note, giving it a
    dramatic quality.


    FX Tesla Bagpipe in A
    Nikola Tesla did a lot of things, unfortunately, he
    never crossed one of his coil transformers with a
    bagpipe. The fuzzed and wave-shaped signal runs
    through a ring modulator tuned to the note 'A'. Forget
    chords - try single notes (e.g. Amin pentatonic) and
    enjoy the truly electric quality of your guitar.

    great distorted bass is often achieved by using a distorted and a DI track and panning them left and right.
    you get the mid- growl (distorted), the sharp attacks and clean bass (DI) and width (left and right panning) while at the same time getting the bass out of the way of the other instuments.


    while the feature discussed here will give you even more options, you can already track the distorted and the DI signal simultaneously and record them to different tracks.

    Thanks guys. I'm struggling to get that low end and crispy tops from my kemper. I guess it's down toplaing with the eq though the standard eq doesn't really cut it for bass guitar. Maybe the centre frequency for bass mid treble and presence are set for guitarists. Having said this I love the unit. It's just setting it up for a bass player.


    the tonestack EQ next to the Amplifier slot is indeed 'voiced' for guitar.
    just use the Studio EQ or Graphic EQ instead. especially the two fully parametric bands in the Studio EQ are quite powerful.
    quite a few bass players - including some pretty big names - are using the Profiler live and in the studio.
    the mix control in the Compressor section for example is a blessing for bass players.

    hi brianiac5150,
    and welcome to the forum!


    while the built-in wah pedal of the Profiler has converted many hard-core pedal users, for now you might be glad to hear that the Profiler handles wah/boost/OD/fuzz/etc. pedals in front just fine.


    cheers
    Don

    type 'nuno' in the search field of the Rig Exchange
    also try 'porno'...
    8|
    ...in the Rig Exchange! in the Rig Exchange!!!


    :D


    p.s.
    I like the 'NB 100 Pornograffitt' (sic) from Kalvitz.com a lot!

    When I was debating whether to buy a Fractal Axe FXII or a Kemper one person on another forum said - 'The internal sample rate of the axe is higher than the kemper. cliff reckons the sample rate of the kemper is actually only 11khz'
    Don't know if that's true?[/size]


    the only guy that can give out reliable information about the internal workings of the profiler is CK.
    I'll look for the post where CK stated the sampling rate of the 'tube' algorithm, it was pretty incredible :)


    edit:
    here we go, the tube simulation algorithm runs @ >700kHz :)


    I understand that you want to make sure that you're buying the right product, but the Profiler isn't exactly brand new anymore (it's been out there for two years, won three m.i.p.a. awards, was reviewed in pretty much all major magazines etc...)
    do you really think that the large number of pro guitarists and producers that use their Profilers on a day to day basis to earn their money would not notice any such bottleneck?

    I wondered are kemper owners convinced the high end is as clear & bright as a real amp?
    Only I'm not sure I'm finding so. Maybe my budget speakers.


    there's been one constant I've encountered again and again - and I posted this more than once, I know ;)


    the better the speaker (in a studio sense), the better the Profiler sounds.


    issues with the low end, or a certain harshness in the high mid/high frequencies are either part of the profile (the way the amp/cab sounded/was miced)
    or issues of your monitoring system/enviroment


    the Profiler in itself has no signature sound