For some styles maybe but for those who know what to listen for you can hear the KPA "signature" in many profiles involving gain, and some not even involving much gain. I have yet to hear hardly any (IMO near zero) profiles that do the 80's cranked Marshall style correctly. Sure, lots of profiles and many claims but almost zero actually achieve it. The closest I've heard so far involved either EQ matching or taking 2 very different profiles and dual tracking them.
Herd mentality doesn't make it so. EMPEROR'S NEW CLOTHES. You might want to read it.
And as Dimi said, this isn't an absolute all or nothing. But there are absolutely issues that need resolving if the KPA is to properly compete with the sound of a real amp IMO.
Sonic
I'm certainly not the one wearing the EMPEROR'S NEW CLOTHES. If memory serves me correctly, you're the one who said that you thought that to you the POD Bean sounds better than the KPA and you're the one who had issues with wrong connections and blamed it on the Kemper, you're certainly the one who keeps finding all these treasure troves of KPA shortcomings and almost consistently it was your user error.
I got consistent results from day one when I received the KPA profiling my amps with stunning accuracy, but you're still unable to do that and all you can come up with is blame the company (somebody else) because you're clearly wearing the Emperor's new cloths.
If I had to struggle that long to get good result from a piece of gear as long as you have, I would have moved on a long time ago instead of persisting that everyone else doesn't have your special ears that can detect the slightest difference and constantly posting the same repetitive ambiguous statements about congestions. In this case, you can trust me, it's not how you see it that everyone is wrong and everyone can't hear, it's quite the opposite